mriguy

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 49 points 3 days ago (5 children)

Sure.

He’ll be confirmed with no problem. They always give Trump whatever he wants.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I think she should do it to fuck with Trump since all his 47 branded merch would then be worthless.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Yup. We know he’s a rapist, a racist, and a criminal, and that didn’t lose him any support. What exactly could there be that would turn off his supporters? At this point I really don’t think anything would do it. They’d just say “well, on him it looks good!”

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 week ago

We know exactly how they’d act, since they eliminated the filibuster for judicial nominees so they could pack the court. Holding ourselves to some standard they will immediately violate when they can get any advantage is stupid.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

The entire point of our existing system is to guarantee the perpetual presence of a large population of hard workers with absolutely no legal rights in the labor pool.

If any complaint means you and your family might be immediately deported, you’re not going to ask for a raise (or most government services), and you sure as hell aren’t going to try to form a union. Employers haven’t figured out how to put all workers on that position yet, but it’s not for lack of trying. They get the benefit of a side effect that legal workers are always afraid their job will be outsourced to immigrants, so they too are leery of asserting their rights.

Whipping up anti immigrant sentiment actually helps perpetuate this system, since it lets you put all the heat on the workers and ignore the role of the employers. And just “getting tough on immigrants” (aka giving government more freedom to gratuitously abuse brown people) will never happen, because it would destroy entire industries, as we find out every time some southern state passes, then almost immediately repeals, this type of law.

Actually penalizing employers would require the labor markets to change in ways the Republicans would hate (fair compensation and rights for workers is anathema to them), and the Democrats don’t seem to care enough about to fight for. Probably because of their longterm shift towards dependence on corporate donors. Honestly, unions should be at the forefront of trying to fix this, but they are not very strong these days, and blaming immigrants is always easier than finding good solutions.

TL;DR Working as intended.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Stone ground white corn. Very popular in the southern US. Similar to polenta (which is made from yellow corn) but you can prepare it in lots of different ways.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago

Now they’ll just change arguments - “China has reduced their emissions so much that now there’s less urgency for us to lower ours”. Heads I win, tails you lose.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago

No worries. Still interesting!

[–] [email protected] 73 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (5 children)

A system of checks and money orders. And cash.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I’m pretty sure the demographic that talks about “my bitch ex-wife” is mostly in the tank for Trump already.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

On the off chance you aren’t joking, no, it’s innocent until proven guilty.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago

Yeah, I think you’re right.

view more: next ›