this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2024
20 points (95.5% liked)

Games

16349 readers
645 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Interesting that they launch Fortnite in other alternative iOS stores as well.

I don't like Epic particularly as they are the giant corpo which cries to the public when other giant corpos disagree with them, but still, that's an interesting move.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Eh, I think the point is to eat marketshare from the App store. They can always pull their games from alternative stores later, right now they just want anything to chip away at Apple's dominance.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago (2 children)

As obviously self-serving as Epic has been since this all started, it's also been instrumental in breaking the walled garden ecosystem precedent across the board, so this is great to see.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

If it were purely self-serving, they'd agree to settle with Google on special terms similar to those offered to a number of other publishers. Court proceedings last for years, as would be obvious to Sweeney, so sacrificing years of revenue for the distant prospect of having to pay 0 to the platforms is easier explained as being ideological than a business decision.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

They also have their own store that they want to supplant the existing players. They spent money and resources on a commercial for a law suit in an attempt to weaponize social media for that store before laying off several hundred employees.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The store came to be as an "f you" to Apple, as evident from the email exchanges at the time. The 1984 trailer from Fortnite seemed to be in the same vein. I don't think that particular trailer was for the purpose of promoting the EGS, as there's not a single hint to the store in the video or its standard placement.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

And I'm sure that's an argument they would use, too, but they're very open about their ambitions elsewhere, and taking down their competitors (other stores) helps theirs stand out when they're plainly out of ideas as to how to do so otherwise.

To be clear, I'm glad those other stores are being taken down a few pegs. Once again, this is helping everyone. But it's from such naked self interest.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Agreed. We can both appreciate the good that comes out of their battles, and still dislike them as a company. It doesn't have to be all or nothing.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

"Let them fight."