Maybe an actual wing got mixed up with the 'boneless' ones? I can't fathom how a (5 CM!!) piece of bone could get in the meat and be unnoticed by both the cook and the diner (who presumably chewed it before failing to swallow?)
this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2024
120 points (99.2% liked)
Weird News - Things that make you go 'hmmm'
973 readers
188 users here now
Rules:
-
News must be from a reliable source. No tabloids or sensationalism, please.
-
Try to keep it safe for work. Contact a moderator before posting if you have any doubts.
-
Titles of articles must remain unchanged; however extraneous information like "Watch:" or "Look:" can be removed. Titles with trailing, non-relevant information can also be edited so long as the headline's intent remains intact.
-
Be nice. If you've got nothing positive to say, don't say it.
Violators will be banned at mod's discretion.
Communities We Like:
founded 11 months ago
MODERATORS
Do not look into "chicken processing". You will be disappointed more than you can imagine.
Well boneless wings has always been a bold faced lie anyway since they don't make them with wing meat.
I remember arguing on the phone with a person taking my order years ago the first time they offered me "white meat boneless wings" and I tried to point out that wings are dark meat not white meat so what they were selling wasn't really wings. They got pissed.
Are they still wings if they don't have feathers?
I've never seen dark wing meat. Drumsticks sometimes have darkish parts but it's no comparison to the color of actual dark meat
Aren't boneless wings just fried chunks of breast meat?
Bonless wings can be anything. The term has no legal meaning.
Did you know that they sell pork wings in Florida and other Southern US states?
Why did you think you've never seen a pig fly? It's because they harvest all the wings.
Same deal with buffalo.
That doesn't sound right, but I don't know enough about zoology to dispute it.
They don’t make em like they used to
What? If you have boneless anything on the menu it must be boneless!
Ohio is a problem and I'm done pretending it's not.
Same way if you call something a "wing" it has to be a wing? (I think this should be a thing but since that's not true the boneless part isn't)
Edit: I said that badly, let me rephrase (and this isn't my opinion I'm just trying to decode the logic): Because "Boneless Wing" already isnt technically true to what the product is (it's not a wing), then the other part doesn't have to be technically true (it's not always bonless).
Now if someone sold, a boneless steak with a bone, then under this logic it would not be allowed.
I mean i would be fine with some spicy nuggets instead (just put the same flavor on and you have boneless chicken something, just need to find a nice name for it and done, ready for the menu).
Laughs in fish fillets.
Ok, but those bones can be eaten without problems (unless they are inhaled...)
Boneless is NOT a "cooking style".
Yeah but counterpoint - Ohio.
Agreed, we should have just given it to the yogurt and moved on. :)