this post was submitted on 01 Jul 2025
462 points (98.7% liked)

Science Memes

15605 readers
1681 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 42 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 12 points 5 days ago (9 children)

This very nice Romanian lady that taught me complex plane calculus made sure to emphasize that e^j*theta was just a notation.

Then proceeded to just use it as if it was actually eulers number to the j arg. And I still don’t understand why and under what cases I can’t just assume it’s the actual thing.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 days ago

I've seen e^{d/dx}

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

What is Phil Swift going to do with that chicken?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

The will repair it with flex seal of course

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 5 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

Why does using it as a fraction work just fine then? Checkmate, Maths!

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 days ago

Division is an operator

[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 days ago

Chicken thinking: "Someone please explain this guy how we solve the Schroëdinger equation"

[–] [email protected] 22 points 5 days ago (1 children)

It was a fraction in Leibniz’s original notation.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 5 days ago

And it denotes an operation that gives you that fraction in operational algebra...

Instead of making it clear that d is an operator, not a value, and thus the entire thing becomes an operator, physicists keep claiming that there's no fraction involved. I guess they like confusing people.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago

De dix, boss! De dix!

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 days ago

Is that Phill Swift from flex tape ?

[–] [email protected] 89 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (6 children)

Mathematicians will in one breath tell you they aren't fractions, then in the next tell you dz/dx = dz/dy * dy/dx

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 days ago

This is until you do multivariate functions. Then you get for f(x(t), y(t)) this: df/dt = df/dx * dx/dt + df/dy * dy/dt

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 days ago

(d/dx)(x) = 1 = dx/dx

[–] [email protected] 21 points 5 days ago

Have you seen a mathematician claim that? Because there's entire algebra they created just so it becomes a fraction.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Also multiplying by dx in diffeqs

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago

vietnam flashbacks meme

[–] [email protected] 21 points 5 days ago

Brah, chain rule & function composition.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 5 days ago (3 children)

When a mathematician want to scare an physicist he only need to speak about ∞

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 days ago

When a physicist want to impress a mathematician he explains how he tames infinities with renormalization.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 23 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

Look it is so simple, it just acts on an uncountably infinite dimensional vector space of differentiable functions.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (7 children)

fun fact: the vector space of differentiable functions (at least on compact domains) is actually of countable dimension.

still infinite though

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 68 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Derivatives started making more sense to me after I started learning their practical applications in physics class. d/dx was too abstract when learning it in precalc, but once physics introduced d/dt (change with respect to time t), it made derivative formulas feel more intuitive, like "velocity is the change in position with respect to time, which the derivative of position" and "acceleration is the change in velocity with respect to time, which is the derivative of velocity"

[–] [email protected] 35 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Possibly you just had to hear it more than once.

I learned it the other way around since my physics teacher was speedrunning the math sections to get to the fun physics stuff and I really got it after hearing it the second time in math class.

But yeah: it often helps to have practical examples and it doesn't get any more applicable to real life than d/dt.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 days ago

yea, essentially, to me, calculus is like the study of slope and a slope of everything slope, with displacement, velocity, acceleration.

[–] [email protected] 42 points 5 days ago (3 children)

Except you can kinda treat it as a fraction when dealing with differential equations

[–] [email protected] 9 points 5 days ago

Only for separable equations

[–] [email protected] 23 points 5 days ago

Oh god this comment just gave me ptsd

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 25 points 5 days ago (1 children)

It's not even a fraction, you can just cancel out the two "d"s

[–] [email protected] 34 points 5 days ago

"d"s nuts lmao

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 days ago

Little dicky? Dick Feynman?

[–] [email protected] 81 points 6 days ago (3 children)

I found math in physics to have this really fun duality of "these are rigorous rules that must be followed" and "if we make a set of edge case assumptions, we can fit the square peg in the round hole"

Also I will always treat the derivative operator as a fraction

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago

is this how Brian Greene was born?

[–] [email protected] 64 points 5 days ago (3 children)

2+2 = 5

…for sufficiently large values of 2

[–] [email protected] 12 points 5 days ago (4 children)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 days ago

I mean as an engineer, this should actually be 2+2=4 +/-1.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 days ago (3 children)

Computer science: 2+2=4 (for integers at least; try this with floating point numbers at your own peril, you absolute fool)

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago

comparing floats for exact equality should be illegal, IMO

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago

units don't match, though

[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 days ago

Statistician: 1+1=sqrt(2)

[–] [email protected] 23 points 5 days ago

i was in a math class once where a physics major treated a particular variable as one because at csmic scale the value of the variable basically doesn't matter. the math professor both was and wasn't amused

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›