this post was submitted on 26 Jan 2024
38 points (95.2% liked)

Games

16697 readers
611 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.sdf.org/post/11258346

Polish developer Reikon Games has reportedly dismissed a significant portion of its workforce.

Sources told GamesIndustry.biz that around 70 people have been laid off, while former producer Rafał Basaj claimed it was around 60 people via a Threads post.

Others told Kotaku that an estimated 56% of the company's employees have been affected.

The layoffs were announced to staff on January 23, 2024, with multiple former employees since posting on LinkedIn and social media platforms that they are looking for work.

GamesIndustry.biz reached out to Reikon Games for confirmation and comment, but has not received a response at the time of writing.

Reikon is best known for 2017 cyberpunk shooter Ruiner, which was published by Devolver Digital.

all 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago
[–] [email protected] 7 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

It's mindblowing that the studio had 100+ people and their only game was apparently RUINER. I was convinced it was a smaller indie game, how could they have that many employees and only release one decently successful game in like 6+ years?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I think that is a microcosm of the whole business right now. Very low interest rates meant that VC were taking bets like this all the time. Which allowed devs to finance expansion well beyond what their revenues would allow. The free money tap turned off and now everybody has to adjust back down. Low interest rates are an engine for growth. Raising rates is meant to crush investment and employment.

Macro economics is bullshit and not empirical at all but, the monetary policy levers do what they are supposed to do.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

VCs chucking millions around, expecting billions, is an engine for growth. Capital is the bottleneck and capital is why these bestselling games now belong to empty studios.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

We will go from one of the best year in gaming in terms of releases, to 2024, where I wonder how many games will actually come out given the amount of workers being abandoned

Edit : from https://publish.obsidian.md/vg-layoffs we're only 26 days into this new year and the number of people laid off is already HALF OF THE TOTAL OF LAST YEAR this is insane

[–] [email protected] 6 points 9 months ago (2 children)

I haven’t chased down sources but I saw a claim that the industry added net 20k jobs in 2023. This might really be more realignment than bloodbath. Anyone who was debt financing payroll has to make changes asap, but the industry still generates tons of revenue and grows YoY.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Fire and rehire at lower rate?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

You got it. Lay off the Seniors, get the kids straight out of college.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Don't even need to! Fire the seniors and hire seniors at junior rates.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

That's interesting, then to me it means that whoever was in charge and made the decision to hire that many people without questioning the long term financial sustainability of such decision must be to blame

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago

That is a valid take. You could also say that all the VC was transferred into payroll for ordinary folks without any return to the SV billionaire club.

Totally different industry, but my company took a huge swing a few years back that blew up in their faces. It’s been rough since then but I put a LOT of money in my pocket during that period and I’m certainly better off than if they had prudently managed on austerity budgets the whole time.