this post was submitted on 23 Jul 2024
574 points (94.8% liked)

memes

9567 readers
2438 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to [email protected]

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

Sister communities

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Harry Potter and the Military Industrial Complex

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Well, I cannot imagine wizard dieing to a nuke. You would have to surprise them I suppose. I mean, what if they teleport the nuke to some other place?

Even if all the tech kept working, I imagine the only way you could beat a wizard as a Muggle is if they don't see it coming.

If they see a gun, sure, the first wizard may be surprised and die, but it will not take long to find a spell that shields them. Rockets? Same story. Sure you can destroy stuff, even kill a bunch. The rest will be back though, and they can teleport, change memories, actually turn into another person or animal, turn you into an animal and whatever else.

The one plot hole in HP that always annoyed me is how Avada Kedavra is supposed to be the worst spell. In the books it is mentioned how Peter Pippeling blew up a whole street with a bunch of muggles in it. That seems way more dangerous...

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago
[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 month ago (4 children)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

This made me realize two things about Harry Potter. 1: why do the wizards not simply use magic AND guns? 2: oculus repairo is a stupid fucking spell. You're telling me there's a specific spell just for repairing glasses? That's just bad writing.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

You've never watched a teleshopping channel, have you? Reality is what's bad writing.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

I dled the whole thing. It's awesome.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Watching this on 1.5g of mushrooms was wild, would recommend

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

Harry got tired of drinking tea

[–] [email protected] 36 points 1 month ago (2 children)

That's one of many many plot holes in Harry Potter.

There's really no depth to the world building beyond, "What if British public schools taught magic?"

It doesn't make sense in any context beyond that because the author never considered it from any context beyond that. Whenever you run into some crazy crap in HP and wonder, "Why TF would anyone do it that way?" The answer is almost always, "Because that's how they do it in British public schools.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

It's also a bit odd that the spell so dangerous it was the absolute peak of the Dark Arts was a spell that just killed one person, and not even reliably. Where are the spells to call down meteors and cause earthquakes?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago

Finding plot holes in Harry Potter is like shooting fish in a barrel. There's no challenge to it.

Rowling took "a wizard did it" as far as it can go.

https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-1-d&q=a+wizard+did+it#fpstate=ive&vld=cid:2884189e,vid:sVgVB3qsySQ,st:0

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It being based off of public schools is a bit odd given that Hogwarts is a boarding school.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That's just the name.

In the UK, "public school" just means that admissions are generally open to the public. They're still very expensive, are often boarding schools, and tend to have a lot of castles on their campuses.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public_school_(United_Kingdom)

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Huh I was not aware of that. Very different from how that term is used in the US.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yeah. It confused me at first too.

It's not too bad when they use some word that we never use at all. I had no trouble figuring out what a "bellend" is.

It's more of an issue when they use a word differently.
Me: "Yo blondie, that's not how you're supposed to wear condoms."
Nigel Covington III: "You git, I most certainly do wear rubbers on my feet."

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I thought "rubber" meant "eraser."

"Fanny" is my favorite. Both referring to anatomy, but one is on the back and everyone has one while the other is on the front and only one sex has one.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

I almost forgot "pants".

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I'm not much of a harry potter fan but wasn't that the whole point of being in hiding

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 month ago (2 children)

They were being killed by muggles left and right, and this was way before the invention of guns, so, yeah, they weren't winning that war in any case.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Actually, at some point in the books they talk about this, and somebody comments how Muggles seldom would actually catch a real witch or wizard. And if they did, the witch or wizard would cast a spell to shield themselves from the fire and pretend to be in pain.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

That's a good point

load more comments
view more: next ›