this post was submitted on 22 Jul 2024
258 points (93.3% liked)

politics

18883 readers
3614 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago

lol that is some headline gore - mixed contradictory metaphors? Oof.

  • went down swinging [fists]-> went down fighting (somewhat obvious to everyone)
  • swinging left -> the article is trying to say he was moving further left ideologically
  • … but it feels like he was swinging (fists) left a lot of the time.

For me, in response to this statement, it really comes down to Biden being somewhat disconnected from the reality on the ground for most Americans. He and his campaign have had difficulty communicating successes for a lot of reasons… but one of the big reasons is that the “wins” on paper largely aren’t translating to making enough of a positive difference to a large enough number of people in terms of lived experience. Like ok great you saved the economy… in an era where most people have nowhere near enough scratch to invest in stocks. So all the “saving” mostly goes into corporate stock buybacks and exec comp packages. The fact that they still don’t seem to understand this stuff is deeply dismaying, and I think it’s pretty clearly a party leadership issue. You can propagandize all you want, but at the end of the day, Democratic and left-leaning voters tend to be far less tribal and gullible than the Republican base these days, and trying to bullshit us on things that are obviously not entirely true is just not going to work very well.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

He's not running anymore. You don't have to pretend he's a progressive anymore. No one bought it.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago

He did beat Medicare, you gotta give him that.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Probably because there were a ton of calls for either of them to be the candidate instead, and they didnt want a split dem race if Biden stayed in.

Its concerning they were supporting him because it shows theyre not in on whatever party leadership talks took place for Biden to step down.

[–] [email protected] 36 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Neither of them are leadership, but I still wouldn't count on that. I think having a strong show of support makes Biden stepping down look classy instead of like he's been hooked offstage like a muppet.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago (2 children)

You know it was Pelosi wielding that hook.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

I maintain he needs an elder abuse screening

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 month ago

Nah, this was a Biden call. Hes got 50+ yrs doing this and is in the big chair right now. No one could have unseated him if he wasent okay with it.

[–] [email protected] 100 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Biden is a veteran politician, a little horse trading of policies for support is nothing new to him. And besides, if you're slugging it out with a populist nationalism type, Bernie's advice is probably some of the wisest you could ask for anyway.

[–] [email protected] 76 points 1 month ago (1 children)

We don’t deserve Bernie. He’s too good for us 🥲

[–] [email protected] 82 points 1 month ago (1 children)

My friend, you deserve a thousand Bernies

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 month ago

Yes, vote local, and vote every time there's a Bernie like politician. Grass roots brought us everyone from Eugene Debs to Bernie Sanders and all before and will come after.

It's local politics where we can enact real change.