this post was submitted on 22 Jul 2024
1270 points (98.7% liked)

politics

19241 readers
2259 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Non-paywall link: 12ft.io/https://www.thedailybeast.com/democrats-mock-donald-trump-as-too-old-to-runlike-he-did-to-joe-biden?ref=home?ref=home

(page 6) 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 10 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

…because they nominated a dinosaur

🦖*RAWR*

[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 months ago (6 children)

How about you never equivocate the best thing that lived on earth to the worst

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 259 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Because he IS too old. Biden did the right thing. Selflessly put the country before himself and listened to his party. I don't think Trump would ever have enough morals or integrity to do that in a million years unfortunately. So we'll have to beat the old loon and his band of circus freaks at the polls, again.

[–] [email protected] 54 points 5 months ago (31 children)

Biden was never supposed to run for a second term, and then dragged his feet until the very last minute. The selfless thing would’ve been to step aside for someone younger before the race began

[–] [email protected] 12 points 5 months ago (3 children)

Yeah, he fucked over everyone by participating in the primaries.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago

... Unlike Johnson, who didn't. And that worked out well for president Humphries in '68.

[–] [email protected] 50 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

Not that I'm suggesting that this was intentional or that he did right to wait, but there are a few upsides. Trump and the Republicans were fully prepared and frothing to take on that blubbering old man from that last debate, but now they're actually going to make a case for Trump over a (hopefully) real contender. And many Democrat voters went from feeling defeated and apathetic, potentially enough to not even bother voting, to being charged with a second chance and a (again, hopefully) more exciting candidate to support. If Biden had declared his intention not to run again before the primaries, the Republicans would have had much longer to prepare and pick apart someone who wasn't such an easy target, and Dems would have been infighting over the nuances of a dozen candidates and pissed off at each other. And, if Harris is the presumptive nomination, for better or worse, the knee jerk reaction from the Right will probably be to play up the racist and sexist angles, which should drive moderates away from the right, not away from Harris.

It's all conjecture, but I only see this as a net positive compared to where we were yesterday.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

I mean, 5d chess if true.

but that would be a dangerous, stupid game - and we know they would never do that, right? right?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 5 months ago (1 children)

agreed, never should have tried for the second bite.

however... dems now have an opportunity to own the news cycle from here until the election. if they do even a halfway decent job, we start trending from "narrow loss" -> "political landslide".

load more comments (30 replies)
[–] [email protected] 134 points 5 months ago (4 children)

Trump doesn't care about the responsibility of being president. He likes the power and prestige of it.

[–] [email protected] 40 points 5 months ago (2 children)

But I don't want real power, because with real power comes real responsibility, and I don't want any of that shit.

I just want the money.

And the illusion of power.

And puss.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 months ago

I call my God hole.

And you wanna fill it with puss?

Yeah.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 months ago

I nominate Shane Gillis as Trump for Kamala's VP pick.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 45 points 5 months ago (1 children)

If there's anyway to convince him not to run that'd be wonderful. There are many Maga folks that emulate him but I don't think they're nearly as likely to be able to actually pull off a coup.

Granted, it's a fucking long shot that he'd listen to anyone.

[–] [email protected] 38 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Trump only listens to people who tell him what he wants to hear.

How do you remove a cult leader like that?

[–] [email protected] 39 points 5 months ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 months ago

I suspect he’ll die out of prison in a natural manner, but relatively soon. Prison is out of the question without the court getting members added. They are fully on the Trump train and even the plain text of the constitution doesn’t sway them.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Convicted felon, didn't get cuffs

Got shot, still grifting.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 5 months ago (3 children)

Needs to be nuked from orbit, just to be sure

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›