Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.
This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.
For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community
here too
https://pivot-to-ai.com/2024/07/20/taylor-francis-feeds-academics-work-to-microsoft-ai/
saw academics grumbling about free labour, so well done v clever T&F
academic publishing companies are truly the scum of the Earth.
I mean, if no one's getting paid, then my preferred price is $0, to everyone in the world.
disgusted, yeah, shocked, not really, have you seen the kind of shit elsevier pulls out? now T&F content joins all open access papers in wisdom woodchipper
$10M is peanuts, reddit deal was 6x bigger
£10 million for a huge chunk of the world's knowledge, without paying the authors. They do nothing and sell us for cheap.
Renk seekers bruhh I don't see why people are still denial about how the exploitation regime operates
If this includes their journals then I guess my stuff is off to the big LLM melting pot to be regurgitated wrongly without context or attribution.
Yay progress 😐
Progress is delicious. Like glue in your pasta sauce.
"it is providing Microsoft non-exclusive access to advanced learning content and data to help improve relevance and performance of AI systems".
I wish it wasn't normal to call these "systems" instead of "products"
Exactly. There needs to be a proper lawsuit challenging AI businesses, and the fact they're taking out these contracts now, after the fact, suggests they know they're liable. They've tried hiding behind the fair use research exemption, however their "research" is complete private and secret, offers no benefit to the academic community, and is entirely driven by commercial product development.
I wonder if individual users have standing to claim for the initial harvesting from before these licenses? At the time, while they got it from reddit or wherever, they collected it without any license, which I think means the original rights holder should be able to sue.