this post was submitted on 19 Jul 2024
106 points (92.1% liked)

Today I Learned

17229 readers
666 users here now

What did you learn today? Share it with us!

We learn something new every day. This is a community dedicated to informing each other and helping to spread knowledge.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must begin with TIL. Linking to a source of info is optional, but highly recommended as it helps to spark discussion.

** Posts must be about an actual fact that you have learned, but it doesn't matter if you learned it today. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.**



Rule 2- Your post subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your post subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Posts and comments which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding non-TIL posts.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-TIL posts using the [META] tag on your post title.



Rule 7- You can't harass or disturb other members.

If you vocally harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.

For further explanation, clarification and feedback about this rule, you may follow this link.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.

Unless included in our Whitelist for Bots, your bot will not be allowed to participate in this community. To have your bot whitelisted, please contact the moderators for a short review.



Partnered Communities

You can view our partnered communities list by following this link. To partner with our community and be included, you are free to message the moderators or comment on a pinned post.

Community Moderation

For inquiry on becoming a moderator of this community, you may comment on the pinned post of the time, or simply shoot a message to the current moderators.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Some government employee made the “new logo” in the 90s for NCSA software (the Common Gateway Interface), and government work is public domain.

Just more evidence that big brother shall releaseth thee work and soul /s

all 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago

Is the government able to commit copywriter infringement? With this logic, I could take a picture of Mario with a bowtie drawn on his chest and upload it to the Library of Congress website, thus making my image public domain.

Actually I Think that would be trademark infringement. Why is copywright law so confusing.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I found the whole copyright thing at Wikipedia for this image pretty funny.

Even the simplest research shows that NCSA is a state-funded agency (through the University of Illinois system), not federal. If that image is in the public domain, it's not for the reason Wikipedia lists.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

It operates as part of the U of I system and receives most funding from the National Science Foundation, a federal agency.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It did get a lot of funding from the NSF in the early days, but the federal government didn't start pushing for public access to research done through grants and contracts until 2013. Before then it was only work done by federal agencies that was non copyrighted.

The National Science Foundation also didn't start funding Mosaic until 1994, which was after CGI had been released.

NCSA gets a lot of its funding from the private sector with partner programs, the University of Illinois, and the State of Illinois as well.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You don’t have to release something to have it be public domain. The NCSA is a state-federal partnership, to which the law about government non-copyright applies.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I'm not sure where you're getting your information.

I work there, have worked there for nearly three decades, and I can tell you that it's not the case.

(Also, it's just NCSA for trademark reasons, without 'the' in front)

[–] [email protected] 39 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

It's a prism. You can't copyright just drawing a prism. (You could probably trademark it, but a trademark would only apply in a particular context.)

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

What do you mean you can't copyright a drawing of a prism? Every drawing you make is automatically copyrighted. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copyright_law_of_the_United_States#Works_subject_to_copyright_law

I think you're confused. Just because it is similar does not mean it is the same. This is not the album with the letters on top. They look different.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I'm saying that while any specific drawing of a prism is protected by copyright, the general concept isn't. Drawing a prism, even one that looks almost identical to the one on the album cover, is not restricted. (I'm not sure we actually disagree.)

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

Yeah, OP just said some weird stuff.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Yes you can. Though as other people pointed out the rainbow is different, so it might not be the same thing.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That reasoning would apply to tons of other logos too. Like "you cannot copyright a drawn apple with a piece bitten off".

[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 month ago

you cannot copyright a drawn apple with a piece bitten off

That's correct, you can not do such. Apple does not litigate its logo with copyright but in trademark disputes. Prepear and Georette are examples of this.

You too can create a logo of an apple with a piece bitten off. It's up to a court to decide if it's coming too close to the Apple trademark, most people want to just avoid that and settle amicably, but if you've got to the pocket change to fight it in court, you can argue that your bitten off apple isn't a trademark infringement.

If you find a company that isn't keen to defend their logo, you can totally get away with it. Apple is on the other end of the spectrum of being someone who will protect their trademarks to the bitter end. Jack Daniels and Disney are two more examples of companies that will legally punch a five dollar start up into a bloody mass over trademarks.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 month ago (2 children)

ackhyually the rainbow isn’t a gradient and the cone of light is too bright so its totally different dude

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

it's a vector recreation of this low-quality gif, which you can't really tell whether it was a gradient or not. but the colors are indeed kinda different and more accurate to an actual rainbow lol

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago

Actually the rainbow means gay and gay is bad. I heard from fox news.