Is this an article? When I click the link in my mobile browser, I can only see the headline and a static image.
Uplifting News
Welcome to /c/UpliftingNews, a dedicated space where optimism and positivity converge to bring you the most heartening and inspiring stories from around the world. We strive to curate and share content that lights up your day, invigorates your spirit, and inspires you to spread positivity in your own way. This is a sanctuary for those seeking a break from the incessant negativity often found in today's news cycle. From acts of everyday kindness to large-scale philanthropic efforts, from individual achievements to community triumphs, we bring you news that gives hope, fosters empathy, and strengthens the belief in humanity's capacity for good.
Here in /c/UpliftingNews, we uphold the values of respect, empathy, and inclusivity, fostering a supportive and vibrant community. We encourage you to share your positive news, comment, engage in uplifting conversations, and find solace in the goodness that exists around us. We are more than a news-sharing platform; we are a community built on the power of positivity and the collective desire for a more hopeful world. Remember, your small acts of kindness can be someone else's big ray of hope. Be part of the positivity revolution; share, uplift, inspire!
Try using a different browser. It's working fine for me. If you are still not able to see it, I have updated the post. You may read it from there.
Thats a very metal way to cure HIV. Glad it worked for them but unfortunately it won't work in most cases
Well, it could work for all cases. Many of them would die before they're cured, but they wouldn't have HIV anymore.
The brutal bone marrow transplant that can "cure" HIV is only an option for patients who also have leukaemia
So they wipe out all the patient's bone marrow, let them simmer in a immuno-bubble-room for a bit, then give them a stemcell bone marrow transplant from someone whose bone marrow is hiv resistant and hope to high hell that the process itself doesn't result in the patient's death.
Oh, and out of caution they continue to consider the patient HIV pos for the rest of their lives anyway.
For me, the real takeaway is that medical professionals no longer view HIV a big enough health risk to consider stuff like this viable for HIV patients in general.
Wouldn't it be more apt to say that this is the first big step towards treating HIV for good? Sure, the current method might be crude, but with time I'm sure it'll get more sophisticated.
This method is literally killing the patient's entire immune system by irradiation. They then replace it with a donor immune system that might in turn try to kill them.
This isn't a good option for the vast majority of patients to wipe out a virus that can be well managed with drugs.
The reason that it was done here is that the treatment is intended to cure them of cancer, and as a side effect eliminates their HIV infection.