Anyone think a failed trump assassination attempt by Iran would be worse than a successful one?
News
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
And yet that rooftop was left unguarded!?
That was ramped up?
Twenty bucks is twenty bucks, bro.
John Bolton still has his Secret Service detail WTF?!
Ignoring the article and focusing ob the picture: how can people leave so much trash behind? More so on a lawn.
I bet people were in more of a hurry to leave than normal, given the... shooting
So, absolutely.
But also I've been to massive concerts in the USA and Canada, and 100% of the time people litter more at the USA based events.
There's always litter though one way or another.
I’m not super-familiar with Canadian attitudes and social mores, but in the time I’ve spent there I get the impression that Canadians tend to feel more socially responsible as a whole. They also tend to expect those around them also conform to that social responsibility. Of course there are going to be those that don’t conform for whatever reason ans are just assholes the same as anyplace in the world. There’s never a shortage of them.
In the US there’s more of a fuck you attitude based partially on the you can’t tell me what to do anti-authority attitude that perversely seems to filter all the way down to basic human decency issues like simply throwing away your trash, returning shopping carts, or even having blinding LED lights festooning your pickup truck. Additionally there’s the US attitude of people being “temporarily embarrassed millionaires” where picking up trash or being responsible about its disposal is beneath the litterer, and that job is left to those beneath them.
It was a gathering of trash people to celebrate a trash human. They're not going to care about it being clean.
Ah, is this the excuse were going to use to dilute the real issue?. That it's Iran. Not a gun-fetishizing mentally-ill right-wing Trump supporter radicalized by his eventual target?
We're really trying to ignore the leopard eating all those faces.
Yeah, this is making them look even worse, tbh. They couldn't stop this kid even with 'ramped up security'? What if Iran had sent someone that could actually shoot?
This kid clipped Trumps ear at 130m using an AR-15. That’s actually pretty good for an amateur.
Honestly I have no idea how hard it is to make that shot, especially if you know you've been spotted. I was basing that comment on how he failed to qualify for the marksmanship club at high school. But maybe he got better in the meantime.
I could easily keep my grouping within an inch or two at that distance shooting at a stationary target with no pressure about being shot myself at any given moment. When I've had deer in the scope at that range or a little further and the adrenaline starts pumping I need to pull back and catch my breath or I'll sweep the cross hairs over the entire body without being able to keep steady and settle. Aiming at a former pres knowing secret service could pop you in a second, that's a recipe for extreme nerves and adrenaline.
It's just crazy that the perimeter was like 100m if trained snipers routinely take out targets at 1km+. If they really thought Iran was a threat it definitely doesn't look like they did anything to stop it (and I think the thing that is really stopping other nation states from assassinating American heads of state or candidates is the guarantee that the US would invade like the next day, not the logistics of actually carrying it out).
All my coworkers were saying the kid was a terrible shot, but I'm honestly impressed given the circumstances
Ignore the lepord so long as it's ripping their faces off.. normal people aren't bothered too much.