this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2024
1032 points (98.0% liked)

politics

19089 readers
3952 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I'm sure this is totally fine

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 12 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

2003

I feel like that'd be important to note right away. That's two decades ago. Not mentioning that makes it sound a lot more recent. Though I guess he was working the same job back then too.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 4 months ago (1 children)

"Putin's hometown" is one of largest city. Saint Petesburg.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

It was a big tourist destination for anyone visiting Russia when that was a desirable thing.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Yes. Also it is former capital.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Also it is just next-door to the Baltic states, so it makes sense to book a short trip to there (for whoever was bribing Thomas with trips back then)

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago

Not as close as to Finland, but close enough.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I am willing to bet the majority of the MAGA movement is funded by Russia. Everything goes back to Putin every fucking time.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

It was funded by oligarchs, and Russia is a playground for oligarchs (until they cross Putin).

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Well some of them, others went to London and started to cross Putin.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

And got a fucking polonium pin prick for it... While in London.

Unless we're talking about different people.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 4 months ago

Hard to get any more corrupt than this.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Fun fact: the constitution talks about supreme Court justices having immunity just as much as it talks about presidents having immunity

[–] [email protected] 14 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Section 1983 of the federal code as written and passed by Congress implicitly says that neither have immunity for official acts that violate the rights of citizens. Someone illegally "amended" the law in 1874 when it was copied from the Congressional Record, to the Federal Register.

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/05/15/us/politics/qualified-immunity-supreme-court.html

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago

What the actual fuck. This country is a joke. I'm shocked we lasted this long to be honest.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Right, but the supreme Court would just find that law unconstitutional. Or ignore the implicit meaning.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Assuming everyone is 100% corrupt, yes

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Who needs everyone? You only need 5. The other 4 can do whatever they want.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 4 months ago (4 children)

Amazing how cheap it is to buy out the highest court of the most powerful nation

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago

I need to get myself a helicopter

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

My guess it there was a lot of promises for the "new permanent administration" as well.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

I just can't imagine what type of person spends their entire lives studying law and justice, applying the Constitution to real life cases, etc., and is then able to just throw that all away for a few boat trips and a vacation or two...

Like there has to be malice here, not just incompetence. Thomas and Alito, at the very least, are purposely setting alight the Constitution they have dedicated their lives to and swore to uphold out of some form of anger or vengeance. It's the only explanation.

They know exactly what they are doing, probably better than anyone else on the planet given their credentials. And for what?

It's sickening.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago

Maybe a gofundme-Campaign? I guess it can't be very hard to raise some measly bucks for a bribe if that's how it has to be.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 months ago

This.

Every time when I read about some asshole selling out his own people its always for a few potatoes. Figuratively of course, but the reality is that you can birbe senators for low 5 figure amounts.

load more comments
view more: next ›