this post was submitted on 10 Nov 2023
0 points (NaN% liked)

News

23266 readers
2994 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

A Texas man who said his death sentence was based on false and unscientific expert testimony was executed Thursday evening for killing a man during a robbery decades ago.

Brent Ray Brewer, 53, received a lethal injection at the state penitentiary in Huntsville for the April 1990 death of Robert Laminack. The inmate was pronounced dead at 6:39 p.m. local time, 15 minutes after the chemicals began flowing.

Prosecutors had said Laminack, 66, gave Brewer and his girlfriend a ride to a Salvation Army location in Amarillo when he was stabbed in the neck and robbed of $140.

Brewer’s execution came hours after the U.S. Supreme Court declined to step in over the inmate’s claims that prosecutors had relied on false and discredited expert testimony at his 2009 resentencing trial.

top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not as barbaric as the murder he committed.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago

By why stoop to that level?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is gonna sound fucked up, but him being murdered by the state was much more of a mercy than being raped, tortured and enslaved behind bars for the entirety of his natural life because of concern he may have been innocent.

Like people dismiss the state taking away large chunks of people's lives because of the "at least they're alive" argument, but you can use that to justify rape and abuse and all sorts of things that are very clearly worse than death.

If I was in his shoes, I'd have demanded expedited execution and so would all of you, if you knew truly what goes on behind bars.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Perhaps you should do something about that "raped, tortured and enslaved" part so the death penalty seems better than prison? Prison is supposed to keep dangerous people away from society and rehabilitate them if possible.

People in prison should be safe from such crimes happening to them.

I really don't understand how people are okay with this "he's going to be killed in prison" sentiment of someone is sent there for very bad crimes when his sentence is "prison" and not "death". Prison should mean being locked away safely from society having time to think about their crimes - nothing else.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

If you cared, why wouldn't you go out and force them to change instead of arguing on the Internet with an elephant?

The only way I as a pink drunken elephant could do anything about it is if I butchered millions of people in a brutal civil war to shut down the entire jail system and violently overthrow the U.S. government. Is that what you want, or are you demanding I instead submit to your opinion and advocate your perspective and feelings on the matter like some pink drunken robot? As if you ranting on the internet about it has done anything to change the system or save any lives?

Grow the fuck up. My opinion on the matter will not change and your mental gymnastics won't change the fact that death really is better than prison in the U.S.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 year ago

The only way I as a pink drunken elephant could do anything about it is if I butchered millions of people in a brutal civil war to shut down the entire jail system and violently overthrow the U.S. government.

🥵

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If that's how you interpret "pro life" then you must be okay with this execution if you're "pro choice". The state "choose" to execute this man after all.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If that's how you interpret "pro choice" no wonder you want control over women's bodies..?

This seems like a poor choice of articles to discuss abortion in though. And yes, I know you didn't start it.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Do you mean to say it's a bad idea to interpret a political slogan literally and in a different context from where it is meant to be used?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I mean, did you make it past the first sentence in my comment?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

... Yes? Not sure how the second sentence is relevant though.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Then exactly what fucking point were you trying to make. If you understood the words I wrote, how did I misinterpret yours? I clearly must have...