this post was submitted on 02 Jul 2024
496 points (99.6% liked)

Technology

59405 readers
2727 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/17558715

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 months ago

Hopefully we can soon get one as home batteries to extend the use of solar panels. Because I don't feel great about having a lithium battery that large in my house

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

According to Datang Group, the power station can be charged and discharged more than 300 times a year.

Well, nice, but "more than 300 times a year" is definitely a weird goal to define or a weird metric to brag about, right?

I mean, what in it's desig could be so critical that they wouldn't just say 'once daily' or something.

Does it require maintenance days when no cells are operational?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago

Maybe competitors are only up to 200 per year and these guys finally achieved 300 per year?

[–] [email protected] 16 points 4 months ago

the power station can be charged and discharged more than 300 times a year. A single charge can store up to 100,000 kWh of electricity and release electricity during the peak period of the power grid. It can meet the daily power needs of around 12,000 households and reduce carbon dioxide emissions by 13,000 tons annually.

Nice

load more comments
view more: next ›