this post was submitted on 23 Jun 2024
571 points (97.2% liked)

News

23275 readers
3644 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 32 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago

yall can have that one, we dont claim her

[–] [email protected] 22 points 4 months ago (2 children)

What the Jesus Fucking Christ

[–] [email protected] 19 points 4 months ago

My money is on "alt-right" brain rot. Some people actually believe they are in a holy/race war for survival.

Poor, poor bastards.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 months ago
[–] [email protected] 27 points 4 months ago

Just toss this one off a cliff save the money

[–] [email protected] -5 points 4 months ago (2 children)

This kind of shit is why I still believe in a death penalty.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (3 children)

Death penalty is expensive, and I don't believe in spending more money than necessary on scum like this.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 59 points 4 months ago (1 children)

drown 3 year old ... child

That's just being fucking demonic for the public

Palestinian Muslim

With current events, yes its a hate crime

[–] [email protected] 33 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I mean shouldn't it be a hate crime regardless of current events?

But yes.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 4 months ago (7 children)

A hate crime is when the crime intentionally targets a specific demographic.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 4 months ago

So it should still be considered a hate crime regardless of current events, no?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago (2 children)

This is true. Hopefully it doesn’t negatively affect the case against this person. Specifying it as a hate crime means that will need to be proved in the court. Or maybe I’m not understanding the law as well as LegalEagle makes me think.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 44 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Same people are demanding to bring the Bible in school

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 64 points 4 months ago (2 children)

This happened in Texas?

I’m amazed she was even arrested. I’m assuming a full pardon with an apology will be forthcoming.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 29 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Wanting to murder a child I can understand but you're not supposed to actually do it. Wtf is wrong with people these days.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 months ago (1 children)

If you don't consider them human, you don't consider it murdering a human child.

That's the problem with bigotry. It makes people view others as less-than-human.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 22 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Y'allqueda in full swing in the US.

Ain't no hate like Christian love.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 months ago

She actually needs the DA to add those hate crimes to the charges so that Abbott can pardon her later, just attempted capital murder and injury to a child aren't going to cut it with him.

[–] [email protected] 135 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Wow. Made it 42 years and thought "I need to murder a child"

[–] [email protected] 58 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (5 children)

To be fair, it was a toddler.

/s in case that wasn't obvious.

Also, "possible hate crime"? It clearly was. Getting really tired of these bullshit headlines that don't actually say what happened. The "alleged" for the crime since they haven't been convicted is already in the headline, that's fine, I get he legal distinction there, but then say what's actually alleged and don't try to hide the reality of what's alleged. This is clearly a hate crime, there's no question of that. It's not an alleged possible hate crime, it's just an alleged hate crime.

According to a press release from the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), the mother appeared to be visibly Muslim, as she was wearing a hijab and modest swimwear to the pool at the time of the incident.

Police said Wolf also asked the mother if two of the children in the pool were hers before allegedly attempting to grab one of them, a 6-year-old boy, who was able to get away.

Wolf also allegedly snatched the mother’s headscarf off while she tried to save her daughter and beat her with it, according to CAIR.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 months ago

It's a CYA thing.

[–] [email protected] 45 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

She was charged with attempted capital murder and injury to a child. ... The Euless Police Department has recommended that the incident be considered a hate crime and the Tarrant County District Attorney’s Office is currently investigating it

"Alleged" is what the DA has charged.

"Possible" is what the DA might add to the charges.

The opinions of the reporter, who is not a lawyer much less a prosecutor, are not helpful.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

“Possible” is what the DA might add to the charges.

If the DA hasn't added that already based on even this limited public information, I question their ability to do their damned job. There's nothing "possible" about this being racially motivated, which clearly makes it a hate crime. The initial charges should have been for a hate crime and adjusted to remove that if necessary.

But it's Texas, they don't want to prosecute white people for being racist against anyone brown, that sets a precedent with the public they don't want.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

If the DA hasn't added that already based on even this limited public information

The DA also has access to non-public information, including potential exculpatory evidence.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Can't imagine what sort of exculpatory evidence there could be for someone asking where someone is from, then trying to drown their child, and beating them with their hijab. There is a pretty damned cut and dry racial motive there. Unless the white woman was secretly Muslim somehow it seems pretty straightforward.

Or... the simplest explanation is that it's a smaller suburb of Dallas-Ft Worth where the largest ethnic group by far is white, in a district that went 62.2% Republican in the 2022 election, and the government officials don't want to publicly denounce racism like that because that's what the citizens in that area expect of their government.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Can't imagine what sort of exculpatory evidence there could be

Not being able to imagine something doesn't mean it can't exist.

the simplest explanation is that it's a smaller suburb of Dallas-Ft Worth

Suburbs don't prosecute, the county DA does. This county voted for Biden in 2020, and it prosecuted 42 hate crimes in 2022.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Suburbs don’t prosecute, the county DA does. And this county voted for Biden in 2020.

You're right, and Presidential elections don't do a good job of showing anything about local matters. Gotta look at the local elections. Since you brought it up...

In the 2022 general election the County Clerk, Criminal District Attorney, Constable, District Clerk, and County Judge elected were all Republican. In fact, the only race not won by a Republican was one of 2 open County Commissioner seats, which a Dem barely won with 51.5% of the vote.

Notice that Criminal District Attorney, Phil Sorrells (R), was just elected in 2022. Prior to that, he was a Judge for Tarrant County Criminal Court Number 10 for 25 years. I'd be willing to bet if someone went back through his criminal sentencing over those 25 years it would show certain, shall we say, biases in those sentences, they almost always do. Sometimes that quack does come from a duck after all.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

The previous DA was also a Republican, so it's clear that Republicans are capable of prosecuting hate crimes.

And I'd be willing to bet that Tarrant County charged as many hate crimes in 2023 as in previous years.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 months ago

Wow, nothing deniable about that at all

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›