this post was submitted on 21 Jun 2024
781 points (95.4% liked)

Science Memes

11004 readers
3154 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 47 points 4 months ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 98 points 4 months ago (5 children)

I feel like there's a lot of these, where someone says "how do you explain [extremely basic, everyday thing] without [religion]?", it's kinda weird. Like being a certain level of religious makes you immune to all common sense.

[–] [email protected] 54 points 4 months ago (6 children)

In my experience of these zealot types, it's that they don't want to know the answer, and won't accept any answer that isn't literally bulletproof all the way back to the beginning of time - no matter what you tell them, God did it.

It's like playing a pigeon at chess. It'll shit on the board and then strut around like it won.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 29 points 4 months ago (4 children)

I think what they are trying to say is that the emotional experience they have when they look at a sunset is similar to the emotional experience that gives them conviction that there is a God. It's not a statement of objective fact about the universe and its processes; it's a statement about their mental and emotional life and how they want to feel inside their own head.

Although, maybe they are saying that no one knows how sunsets work and so therefore a wizard did it. I would hope it is that first thing though.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 4 months ago

Although, maybe they are saying that no one knows how sunsets work and so therefore a wizard did it. I would hope it is that first thing though.

There is still a decent chance it's the second tbh. Fucking magnets/tide goes in etc.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I feel like it has to be the second thing, but not everyone has those religious experiences, and even the religious don't always correlate these things to God. It just requires so many layers of weird assumption that I really don't know what to think.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] -3 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Isn't it more of a blue shift / red shift situation, rather than scattering?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

There is a very small amount of red shift. If you were standing on the equator watching a sunset, then your radial velocity relative to the sun is only ~461m/s. So the green light from the sun 550nm would be red shifted by +0.0008nm. That little red shift wouldn't be noticeable. However, as the sun sets there's a lot more atmosphere in the way, which scatters blue light more than red light (Why the sky is blue). Also in a sunrise you are moving towards the sun, so sunrises would be blue! :P

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 39 points 4 months ago (1 children)

No, it's definitely atmospheric scattering. Blue and red shifting occurs when interstellar objects accelerate towards or away from us near the speed of light

[–] [email protected] 19 points 4 months ago (4 children)

Imagine the horror if the earth accelerated at such extreme speeds on a regular basis.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 months ago

How do you know it doesn't? Science.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 4 months ago
[–] [email protected] 31 points 4 months ago (2 children)

The sun just... set? I don't understand what is to be explained.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 4 months ago

Well, she's a flat earther, so how does the sun set work without God?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 months ago

Idiots. You shouldn't care to explain anything, they are beyond dumb.

[–] [email protected] 114 points 4 months ago (8 children)
[–] [email protected] 19 points 4 months ago

Hanlon's Razor and all that, but I just assume that's to drive up interaction in the post.

Rant/ramble ahead, you can skip:

By misspelling something, or just doing/saying something that common sense should say is wrong ("life hack, I just discovered this thing that literally every 5 year old already knows about") you will draw out all the people who are genuinely trying to help, people who just can't help themselves but smugly correct someone, people who THINK they know the right way but aren't sure, people who claim to have never seen the right way before, and all the bitch fights such comments produce.

The increased interactions make the post do better in algorithms, which means it goes out to more and more people, who continue the cycle.

My wife watches short form endless scrolling videos despite knowing how bad those are for your mental health, and some of the people she stops to watch are CONSTANTLY pulling the "common sense says otherwise" one. Like my dude you did NOT just figure out in your 20s that you can wait for the shower to warm up before you get in. Literal toddlers know better. It's such a simple thing, I genuinely do not believe anyone in their 20s just gets in the shower while the water is still cold because they never figured out they can wait for the warm water. But hoooo boy did their video take off and have millions of views, and thousands of comments about how wild that is.

[–] [email protected] 104 points 4 months ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 41 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

How do you explain me looking this psycho if there is no SATAN

[–] [email protected] 49 points 4 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 24 points 4 months ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Well, it takes one to know one!

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›