this post was submitted on 20 Jun 2024
507 points (90.0% liked)

Greentext

4390 readers
1024 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago

What about the Cat Detector Van?

[–] [email protected] 26 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Conservatives making things up and getting angry about it

[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 months ago (1 children)

TV licence is a real thing though

[–] [email protected] 22 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

It’s just a way of funding the BBC that was devised before a TV was something that essentially everyone had. Since it’s delivered OTA it seemed easier to tax the device itself then it was to tax everyone unfairly. So calling it a “license” is fairly outmoded, it’s really a tax. You also don’t have to pay it if you don’t actually receive TV channels.

It should just be rolled into regular taxes now, but who is going to propose and approve a new tax in this day and age? So it’s easier not to touch it.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago

I wish we had a TV tax in Canada. The funding of the CBC is a political football, so I sometimes feel like CBC News has to walk a tightrope to avoid having the government slash the budget.

It's probably better that there's just a tax on the device. Sure the UK government could meddle with that tax to cut the budget of the BBC, but it feels like it would be less likely since people would rightly ask why they're meddling with it. People are less likely to ask questions if the government is cutting a budget because "gotta pay off the national debt!"

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] -1 points 4 months ago

you neither know what 1984 is about, or the word 'literally'.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

In 1984 it's the TV that turns you in

[–] [email protected] 40 points 4 months ago (2 children)

This reminds me of how Brits were always totally obsessed with all the regulations that the unelected EU bureaucrats were supposedly inflicting on us all the time, and then you’d go to France and see kids diving off a high-board into a shallow pool contaminated with battery acid with absolutely no lifeguards to be seen, and generally no-one seems to give a shit.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Not all of France is like Paris, and the Seine is not a pool. (Plus, battery acid would probably count as a good attempt to clean it up, not as contamination.)

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 months ago

French people let their dogs shit absolutely everywhere and nobody cares. That was the really surprising thing for me.

Paris is beautiful but you better keep an eye on where you're stepping.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Yeah but you can't wear boxer style trunks otherwise they will shout at you. They have weird priorities over there

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago
[–] [email protected] 19 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Just so everyone's aware the police do not care if you have a TV license.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, that's handled by the Royal Guard.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 months ago

Only their TV department though

load more comments
view more: next ›