Kevin got the point so he wins.
this post was submitted on 16 Jun 2024
1413 points (98.3% liked)
Comic Strips
12585 readers
3048 users here now
Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.
The rules are simple:
- The post can be a single image, an image gallery, or a link to a specific comic hosted on another site (the author's website, for instance).
- The comic must be a complete story.
- If it is an external link, it must be to a specific story, not to the root of the site.
- You may post comics from others or your own.
- If you are posting a comic of your own, a maximum of one per week is allowed (I know, your comics are great, but this rule helps avoid spam).
- The comic can be in any language, but if it's not in English, OP must include an English translation in the post's 'body' field (note: you don't need to select a specific language when posting a comic).
- Politeness.
- Adult content is not allowed. This community aims to be fun for people of all ages.
Web of links
- [email protected]: "I use Arch btw"
- [email protected]: memes (you don't say!)
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Commenting against the Lemmy narrative be like:
What is the Lemmy narrative from your experience?
Israel bad, AI bad, police bad, Elon bad, Capitalism bad, Boeing bad, Microsoft bad, Apple bad, Facebook bad, rich people bad, landlords bad, C.E.O.s bad, ads bad, cars bad, SUVs/trucks very bad, piracy good, bikes good, uBlock Origin good, trains good, Linux good, bats good, Ukraine good, protests good, socialism good ...
To be honest, I agree with all of these. Seeme line I am at the right place.
Lol what maniac would hold opposite opinions for all of these? I like AI though.
I like AI though.
Burn the heretic! Buuuurrrrrnnnn!
Probably someone with limited reasoning capabilities who sees the world as black and white and thinks things are either good or bad but can't see the near infinite amount of nuance and complexity in them.
load more comments
(1 replies)
load more comments
(1 replies)
I've heard beans are good too.
I've heard not pooping for three days is good too.
God that got old quickly.
burn the witch
i can easily agree with 90% of that. The remaining 10% needs asterisks pointing towards further nuanced discussion. I'll not specify which topics go into which category.
I also agree with most of that, but that doesn't make it OK to downvote opinions to the contrary for no other reason than "I disagree".
If comments of different perspectives, made in good faith get downvoted to oblivion then participation is discouraged, debate gets replaced with circle jerking and Lemmy becomes a very boring and out of touch echo chamber just like Reddit.
Downvotes should only be used for comments that are off topic, factually incorrect, hateful or made in bad faith etc.
Downvotes should only be used for comments that are off topic, factually incorrect, hateful or made in bad faith etc.
So something like this comment: https://lemmy.ca/comment/9747509 Which equates not liking Elon Musk with hate groups against minorities?
Usually when people complain about something like "the Lemmy Narrative" they're usually not bringing nuanced discussion to their posts and are just upset that people aren't agreeing with their "hot takes."
That comment received 17 downvotes but the only person willing to reply deleted their comment.
The comment seems rather silly and I'd wager that the writer is making a satirical comment about the repetitive nature of Lemmy's narrative rather than legitimately equating people that dislike Musk to the Ku Klux Klan. If anyone was willing to engage the writer rather than just burying the comment then it's possible you may have seen that.
load more comments
(2 replies)
load more comments
(10 replies)
load more comments
(10 replies)
Wait, aide from all the others, "Boeing bad" is just a narrative? Dude, have you been living under a rock?
Linux good should have been repeated at least 5 times in that list
I agree. Cannot repeat that one often enough.
load more comments
(1 replies)
Wow, quite an extensive list. Haven't expected that. Thanks for sharing!
Yeah, I guess there is some truth to it.
load more comments
(5 replies)
load more comments
(2 replies)
“If you can’t pound the facts, pound the table”.
— republicans.
I don't think I ever saw this show. Is it basically the same as the drinking game of the same name?
I don't know the drinking game.
There's a few variations, but the one I'm most familiar with is like go fish, except you don't have to be honest if you have the card someone else asks for. I've played versions done with trivia, though where you have to determine if the answer given is real or bullshit (which would be more likely to turn into a game show). I've only done the latter like twice and I was drunk at the time so I don't remember the exact rules. 🤣
load more comments
(1 replies)
I'm Sam Reich and I've been here the whole time!
That's gonna be...
* rolls a dice *
16 points taken away from Brennan
Looks like Sam needs to sell some more merch.
Social media in a nutshell
YOURE WRONG AND HERE LET ME EXPLAIN WHY BUT INSTEAD OF EXPLAINING I USE A PERSONAL ATTACK
The next US presidential debate in a nutshell.
Republican debates in a nutshell.
Not just republicans / politically right-wing oriented folks. From my experience you encounter this everywhere where people haven't learnt how to have a civilised discussion. An important part of this is the ability to self-reflect and distinguish emotions from opinions from facts. Humans are emotional beings in their core and therefore the most are fallible. It's only natural to resort to an emotionally driven and often stubborn defence mode if one encounters a contrary opinion. Even more so if that opinion is expressed in an emotionally loaded manner. It's unfortunately a very counter-productive human behaviour.
And we have that a lot on the internet. Sadly.
load more comments
(1 replies)
Unrealistic: in the real version, no awnser would be declared as fact. Even if one is clearly wrong the awnser will always be:
"It is important that we listen to both sides"