I know this is an older article, but EAC has had compatibility with Linux for years at this point. Linux is also really easy to compile and develop for compared to MacOS. They just don't want to because there aren't enough players to justify the cost, most likely. Also might have some incentive to keep their game off the hardware of their biggest competitor.
this post was submitted on 11 Jun 2024
229 points (75.4% liked)
Games
16679 readers
778 users here now
Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)
Posts.
- News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
- Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
- No humor/memes etc..
- No affiliate links
- No advertising.
- No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
- No self promotion.
- No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
- No politics.
Comments.
- No personal attacks.
- Obey instance rules.
- No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
- Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.
My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.
Other communities:
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Actually, I think they don't want linux gamers, with their higher technical savvy. Some game dev companies love how 90% of their bug reports come from 10% of their users (and even brag about it). Other companies would rather just not get those 90% of bug reports.
It's probably a good thing because your average Joe Public can't write the bug report to save their life.
You get titles like "It's broken and not working". If you are very lucky you'll also get a screenshot where everything looks absolutely fine and with absolutely no context as to what the problem supposedly is. The reason technical savvy people can write good bug reports is because they disproportionately work in IT and see terrible support tickets everyday, and know what not to do.
For example, if you're reporting that outlook will not load it's possibly a good idea to give a phone number and not an email address for contact purposes. Just a thought.
The article I had found on the topic suggested linux users provided higher quality bug reports, in addition to more bug reports.
The real issue is that some game companies don't want bug reports because they don't want to fix bugs.
i remember playing fortnite in its prime, bugs were never fixed, they stayed there for years. Cosmetics on the other hand where added daily ...
That's a valid development strategy. It seems to have worked out for them. I suppose it kind of makes sense as long as nothing is breaking.
I don't even know if it's still a popular game as it's a bit hectic for me. But it's had a good run.
I think most Linux gamers understand they're not going to get official Linux support. And most of the cases it's also not necessary because the compatibility layer is pretty good. The only big hurdle is anticheat and that's where epic would have to do the bare minimum of adding their own native EAC client to Fortnite.
Now the argument that it would increase cheating in a hugely popular game like Fortnite is somewhat legitimate, but I think it's more likely Sweeney would rather let leopards eat his face than support anything related to Valve.
Also if the typical Linux user is like me they're never spending a cent on a free game. Which invalidates their whole business model.
I think the argument of increased cheating has some merit, but less so in hugely popular games like fortnite. Because no anticheat is actually perfect and people who want to cheat will just use whatever method works. In a popular game like fortnite the demand is high enough that someone will find a way to cheat regardless of Linux support
Thank you, Tim Epic
Okay, now give me another free game Epic. I've got over 100 probably on you wacko store and have not paid for a single one.
I've got like 400.
Think I only paid for Outer Wilds plus the DLC, and Untitled Goose Game out of all those, because everybody should play Outer Wilds.
You say that like you're getting one over on them. But they've successfully got you to download their shitty software. You think they aren't aware of what they're doing?
This is where the Heroic Games Launcher comes in, it only downloads the game itself, no Epic Games Launcher to be seen
They know what they're trying to do, which is to bait people into spending money on their platform so they can have revenue numbers to show developers to get them to release on their platform to get people to want to spend money with them without bait.
Taking the bait but not getting caught in the trap isn't quite pulling one over on them, but it's also not what they were hoping for, so it's not not taking advantage.
Step 1: Redeem games through my web browser.
That's it, there is no step 2.
So you don't actually play the games? You just redeem them?
Not the other guy but I download them through heroic, install a crack, repack, store on my NAS. That is, if the game is one I'd like to keep for the future.
So yeah some of us are absolutely taking those free games AS free games without downloading their software. A couple of mine have been "loaned" to friends and family, even.
Same here, download everything through Heroic
Correct. Fuck Epic. They're awful.
Full transparency though, I've played precisely one game on epic games store, Alan Wake 2 because I like Remedy as a developer and want to support them. Alan Wake 2 will never come out on any other platform and I'm not buying a console to play one game.
Okay but redeeming the games doesn't actually do anything. Epic doesn't care. You're not messing with them by just having an account if you don't use it
Epic is subsidizing the sale of the games. It costs them money and muddies their metrics.
Oh no, not the metrics!
I'm sure they're fully aware that some percentage of people will redeem the games with no intent of actually playing them.
The whole point is to generate word of mouth for their store. You're out here doing their job for them, talking about how many free games you've gotten from them.
And you're out here defending them. 🤷🏼♂️
Lol No, fuck Epic. I'm saying don't brag about shit that doesn't matter. Like "Hooray, I'm playing right into their marketing scheme. Surely they must be furious!"
That's certainly an opinion. Mine is that participating in leeching their freebies and not actually engaging in the platform in a meaningful way costs them money with zero benefit. They're giving away games to get people into their ecosystem. If players aren't participating in the ecosystem, then it's not working and just costing money. This is techbro 101.
You're entitled to your opinion. But you're not changing my mind on this.
Why tf would you post this without at least putting a date on it lol
I noticed too late, I forgot the steam deck is old now.
view more: next ›