I think this is supposed to be a trick question.
this post was submitted on 08 Jun 2024
1211 points (98.4% liked)
memes
14141 readers
3182 users here now
Community rules
1. Be civil
No trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour2. No politics
This is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world3. No recent reposts
Check for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month4. No bots
No bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins5. No Spam/Ads
No advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment
Sister communities
- !tenforward@lemmy.world : Star Trek memes, chat and shitposts
- !lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world : Lemmy Shitposts, anything and everything goes.
- !linuxmemes@lemmy.world : Linux themed memes
- !comicstrips@lemmy.world : for those who love comic stories.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
The question is from project management certificate exam
My kid showed me a test question from a junior high math test about construction a building in 12 months with x number of workers, how many workers do they need to hire if they want it done in 6 months.
So I guess if you answer that question "wrong" youd be smart, and if you answer it right, management. Even a junior high student mocked it...
load more comments
(4 replies)
load more comments
(1 replies)
Reminds me of an animator saying ''If a pregnant woman takes nine months to have a baby, can four women have a baby in two and a half months?''
The point is, somethings can't be done faster through simple numbers. Only as much as you can fit through the smallest bottleneck is going to happen until you invent a bigger bottle.
load more comments
(5 replies)
You can play and record one voice, then do next and next and next.
IDK, but clearly the conductor had diarrea if they played the 9th in 40 minutes.
I did orchestra as student, and there's so much you get out of watching the conductor, way more than the downbeat, and a good conductor, orchestra relationship can get to the point subtle nuances effect how you play, and I just imagine a guy trying to conduct and hold his cheeks closed, and the whole rushed performance sounding absurd with unintentional volume and speed changing abruptly all over the place.
Let’s say you put like 1000 violinists all in a big, long row. Then, have the first violinist play a note, then the second plays the very same note, then the third, and so on. Let’s say you could also time it so that at the very moment the sound wave from one violinist hits the next is when that one plays the note. Brrrrrrump! All the way across. Let’s also say you could time it perfectly so that the waves don’t cancel each other out. What would happen?
I think eventually you reach a point where previously played notes would lose all of their energy, meaning there's probably an upper limit on how loud it would get for an observer at the end. Something something Doppler effect.
load more comments
(2 replies)
load more comments
(1 replies)
The premise is already wrong. No orchestra can play Beethoven's 9th symphony in 40 minutes, this piece is longer than an hour.
It also requires a chorus
I prefer a flanger and a 200 ms delay
Maybe it's longer than an hour if only 80 players play it. This is 120!
load more comments
(3 replies)
load more comments
(3 replies)
Like a traveling bard army
20 minutes, because the symphony only needs to be played by half as many players
The greatest killer shockwave ever written
Maybe a trick question.
It is. The original worksheet it's cropped from says "beware, one of these is a trick question!", but obviously that was cropped out because someone really wanted to create an opportunity to feel superior to someone.
It's a great question that reinforces critical thinking.
Having the tools is one thing, learning to apply them correctly to a problem is another.
40 minutes, unless they play really fast.
So this is where managers learn math.
I will recite Hofstadter's Law:
It always takes longer than you expect, even when you take into account Hofstadter's Law.
Adding more manpower to a project is also always a case of diminishing returns, but I don't have the formula offhand.
We need a player for every note in the score(tied notes can be played by a single musician). On the conductor's downstroke everyone plays their note. Every note of the 9th played simultaneously. I want to hear this, but I don't think that my poor old computer would function if I opened that many individual instruments in Reason.
Just put the orchestra on a spaceship approaching light speed, and you can take even less time (relatively experienced by an off-spaceship audience.) If you still want the shockwave, you can use an Alcubierre drive.
Just make sure it's not Hotblack Desiato's spaceship, unless you want the orchestra to dive into the sun.