Age is more than a state of mind, its a state of Florida
this post was submitted on 03 Jun 2024
713 points (98.9% liked)
Memes
8318 readers
970 users here now
Post memes here.
A meme is an idea, behavior, or style that spreads by means of imitation from person to person within a culture and often carries symbolic meaning representing a particular phenomenon or theme.
An Internet meme or meme, is a cultural item that is spread via the Internet, often through social media platforms. The name is by the concept of memes proposed by Richard Dawkins in 1972. Internet memes can take various forms, such as images, videos, GIFs, and various other viral sensations.
- Wait at least 2 months before reposting
- No explicitly political content (about political figures, political events, elections and so on), [email protected] can be better place for that
- Use NSFW marking accordingly
Laittakaa meemejä tänne.
- Odota ainakin 2 kuukautta ennen meemin postaamista uudelleen
- Ei selkeän poliittista sisältöä (poliitikoista, poliittisista tapahtumista, vaaleista jne) parempi paikka esim. [email protected]
- Merkitse K18-sisältö tarpeen mukaan
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
I feel personally attacked.
I saw Aliens opening night with my dad when I was 7. I suppose I'm basically a mummy now going by this Dr lol.
Rip
It was the first one, Alien, for me. I was maybe four. Nightmares didn't stop until my late twenties, but it's my favorite movie now. No movies scared me after that!
Have you picked out a nice nursing home yet?
Too busy looking for a funeral home at this point
Raise your hand if you saw the original Hans shot first version of Star Wars in the theater.
Additionally, I remember my mother going to see Elvis live. The real one, not some seedy Vegas lounge impersonator.
If she did that before you were born, too, there is a chance Elvis is your father.
Spacetime has just warped my brain if I can remember her doing something before I was born.
Who knows what kind of powers a son (daughter?) of Elvis has.
ARE YOU NOT ENTERTAINED?
ARE YOU NOT ENTERTAINED?
You've sold me queer giraffes!
I use a pill box, and it's not the ww2 kind.
I mean why not both since you're clearly so ancient (like me :( ).
Gladiator? Let's talk about Star Wars.
You like "basically dead" old? I'll show ya "advanced state of decomposition" old...
You know what film my father took me to see when it came out?
"Midway".
Not Michael Bay "Midway", no siree... I'm talking Charlton Heston, Glenn Ford, Henry Fonda "Midway", in glorious Sensurround Sound™️, which seemed to be a big selling point at the time, the latest and greatest Hollywood movie magic tech.
It's not Michael Bay. It's Roland Emmerich. Bay did Pearl Harbour, which was fucking awful.
From the looks of another comment down the thread, there's gonna be quite a bit of people like me, who get Emmerich and Bay mixed up.
The bombastic, clumsily unrealistic abuse of CGI might fit fantasy or disaster movies, but it is positively jarring in a war movie, which requires a more sober or constrained style of direction. WWII physics of motion shouldn't look like a fucking video game on the large screen, not even the dogfights.
And let's not even get started on the rote and clichéd emotional ~~palate~~ palette in the romantic subplots.
EDIT: a word
It depends, your father could have taken you, when you were 2 or 17 - it's almost a lifetime of a difference.
So you're either a dinosaur or a microbe.
I'm somewhat of a dinosaur myself.
I just had to look that movie up. Is it a good one?
It uses a combination of practical footage (like Christopher Nolan did with Dunkirk), a ton of cleaned-up WWII archival footage, and a sprinkle of special effects with miniatures. Overall, it looks pretty good.
The "cast of thousands" is front-loaded with some old school screen legends, plus many who went on to become TV stars (Tom Selleck, Erik Estrada, Dabney Coleman).
The film slowly builds up momentum, the way other war films of the time like "A Bridge Too Far" did. It takes over an hour for the Battle Of Midway itself to begin, putting all the pieces into place, and historically it was a painstaking process, so many things had to happen for the battle to start and unfold the way it did.
And unlike so many more recent films of the genre, there isn't any fictional personal drama nor romantic subplots. It's long enough as it already is, telling a grand sweeping story.
Very much a product of its' time, yes I'd definitely recommend it, although I prefer that leisurely pace of 70s films, it's a matter of personal taste, maybe because growing up with those kinds of films.
I prefer old films and shows too, when given the choice. I enjoy the slower pacing, fewer cuts, and heavier reliance on the quality of the actors, because special effects themselves couldn't carry the whole movie.
Thanks you for your detailed review, dude. Definitely mentioning all the stuff I'd be looking for.
And unlike so many more recent films of the genre, there isn't any fictional personal drama nor romantic subplots. It's long enough as it already is, telling a grand sweeping story.
This has been slowly creeping up and tiring to see in all movies. The "archetypes" have been used so many times already that it feels like watching the same stuff over and over again, with a different coat.
It is solid if you enjoy that genre.
view more: next ›