this post was submitted on 02 Jun 2024
435 points (98.2% liked)

politics

19138 readers
3318 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 months ago

I love how some people have 'private moments' in public. It's like we don't matter on their planet.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 5 months ago

Kyle Clark is a Colorado treasure. I watched his show almost every night since 2018 until I moved out of Colorado. He is witty, insightful and just the right amount of sarcastic. I hope he is still on air when I finally go back home

[–] [email protected] -5 points 5 months ago (1 children)

TBF if I were running for a public office that oversees civil rights, infrastructure, military, and a national budget and a debate moderator was asking me questions about a public sex act then I would also be a little peeved.

That said, taking an unbiased stance with people like her is an impossible task from the very beginning.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

From her very own "Contract with Colorado":

Leadership. I am a strong conservative with principles that I will always stand up for. I’ll hold myself accountable and you can, too. I can be reached at [email protected].

If part of your campaign is specifically about being principled and holding yourself accountable, a sex act in a public space is absolutely fair game regardless of the venue in which the question is posed.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Her proclivity for finger-banging doesn't affect any of her policy stances (which are awful or worse). Other than that I agree with you.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 5 months ago (1 children)

The way she speaks it's like her words have no meaning. Nonsensical bullshit woman.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago

It's not the crime, but the coverup. So much of this would be a non-issue if she'd simply owned it, rather than talking out of both sides of her mouth.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Again, every time I see Lauren Boebert’s face, I just picture Sarah Palin running away from a bad taco truck, about nine months before Lauren’s birth. 🤷‍♀️

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

That's spicy.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

HOOO-WEEEE, look at her go!

[–] [email protected] 14 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

I guess she doesn’t know what “expected level of privacy” law means yet. She will though if she tries to pursue it. Anything outside of a bathroom or private owned business you can’t sue someone for filming footage as you can’t expect privacy. Or maybe she knows this so caustic words is all she can think to do.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago (2 children)

I wouldn't imagine even a privately owned business would qualify for privacy. I don't expect any privacy when I'm walking around in Walmart.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Ok so for any of you confused about what would be an expected level of privacy while recording people in public with a cel phone:

The person working the back office of Walmart crunching numbers where customers aren’t allowed has an expected level of privacy.

The people using the bathroom in Walmart also have expected level of privacy.

The people in the changing room has an expected level of privacy.

If you were caught with a cel phone recording in any of these circumstances you could be persecuted for violating privacy.

If however you’re walking around on the main floor of Walmart recording a person looking at the price on a can of beans, you’re safe from legal prosecution as far as privacy laws (although that isn’t to say you are safe from being charged as a stalker or harassment in a certain context) .

And legally you could record what cops are doing out in public.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago

It's about public access. If the public is generally allowed in a space, you have no expectation of privacy in that space. Anyone can have an eidetic memory, which is as good as having a camera in their hand. If they can hear it, see it, or reach it from a public space, you can't consider it secure.

[–] [email protected] 56 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

LOL, the magabrains just hate it when they don't have a platform that just lets them lie and lie and lie.

The notion that someone can push back, even if ever so gently, triggers them endlessly. Beetlebert is such a snowflake.

load more comments
view more: next ›