this post was submitted on 02 Jun 2024
-27 points (41.3% liked)

Unpopular Opinion

6249 readers
90 users here now

Welcome to the Unpopular Opinion community!


How voting works:

Vote the opposite of the norm.


If you agree that the opinion is unpopular give it an arrow up. If it's something that's widely accepted, give it an arrow down.



Guidelines:

Tag your post, if possible (not required)


  • If your post is a "General" unpopular opinion, start the subject with [GENERAL].
  • If it is a Lemmy-specific unpopular opinion, start it with [LEMMY].


Rules:

1. NO POLITICS


Politics is everywhere. Let's make this about [general] and [lemmy] - specific topics, and keep politics out of it.


2. Be civil.


Disagreements happen, but that doesn’t provide the right to personally attack others. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Please also refrain from gatekeeping others' opinions.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Shitposts and memes are allowed but...


Only until they prove to be a problem. They can and will be removed at moderator discretion.


5. No trolling.


This shouldn't need an explanation. If your post or comment is made just to get a rise with no real value, it will be removed. You do this too often, you will get a vacation to touch grass, away from this community for 1 or more days. Repeat offenses will result in a perma-ban.



Instance-wide rules always apply. https://legal.lemmy.world/tos/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Most free web sites pay for their upkeep with ads. It has been an unwritten agreement since forever (or at least as long as there have been ads on the web) that if you consume the content, you pay the creator by looking at the ads on their site.

Consuming the content without looking at the ads is like shoplifting because you don't like the way a store's checkout counter works and/or the fact that they want money from you at all.

(page 2) 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 19 points 4 months ago (5 children)

Do you read every billboard on the road? After all they’ve paid for that patch of sky, what obligation do you have to glance that way without paying them the courtesy of processing their inane drivel. Ever see the same ad more than once? Me neither. Every time I see an ad, like a stupid, happy cow, I am entertained once again.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 months ago

Unpopular indeed.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Not sure if the opinion is popular or not, but only ⅓ of web users even use ad blockers.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 months ago

Honestly, that seems high

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 19 points 4 months ago (5 children)

I don't agree, but thanks for posting an actually unpopular opinion. Based on the voting, this sub should just get renamed to popularopinion and be done with it.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 39 points 4 months ago (2 children)
  • you pay the content creator by buying their content, not by browsing ads on their site – ads are a really annoying tip jar being waved in your face when you’re trying to hand money to the cash register
  • advertisers have been given plenty of warning to behave themselves and they refuse, they are parasitic leeches bleeding both creator and purchaser
  • adblockers are the effect, not the cause
    • original websites were ad free
    • banner ads were added and we tolerated them
    • advertisers then added in distracting flashing effects, loud audio cues, broke security with Flash, broke accessibility
    • adblockers invented
    • advertisers shed crocodile tears and pretend to be contrite
    • advertisers start pushing tracking, malware, phishing, crypto-miners
    • adblockers are now as important as antivirus for the safety of your computer/tablet/phone
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 30 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Remember print magazines and newspapers? Ads pay a large portion of the costs of producing them, but no reader is obliged to look at any ads at all. Advertisers pay for a chance to be seen, not for an obligation for anyone to look at them. Since nobody has any obligation to read the ads, avoiding them cannot be a violation. You pays your money and you takes your chances.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

What about people who pay for their internet by data used, is the website not stealing from the user by wasting data with the unwatned ads?

[–] [email protected] 65 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Counterpoint: The checkout counter at the store doesn't follow me out into the parking lot, grab my license place number and sell it to whoever wants it, or follow me into other stores.

Definitely an unpopular opinion, though! Take my upvote.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

They may grab your payment info though, and use it to build a profile of you that tracks your spending habits to share with others.

Source: was one of the people whose cards had been compromised by the massive data breach Target had about a decade or so ago, because Target had been saving payment information on every customer to build profiles from.

Now I think the newer chip-based cards and tap to pay have made it harder to track customers, but that's basically why every company is trying to push its own app these days.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 4 months ago (4 children)

If using a adblocker is theft then watching a commercial without buying the product is theft.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 4 months ago

or not watching the commercial.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›