this post was submitted on 06 Feb 2024
306 points (90.5% liked)

politics

19103 readers
3412 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 43 points 9 months ago (7 children)

IIRC about 2/3rds of americans are living paycheck to paycheck. That is not an economy that is working for the people.

We need dramatic overhauls that Biden, and especially Trump will never deliver. We need employee ownership of companies for starters.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I don't think that's a starter. I think that's a grand paradigm shift that while it would no doubt be a great boon would not be easy or quick to implement.

Universal Healthcare, UBI, climate resolutions, voting reform, SNAP expansion, increases to minimum wage, etc. would be easier, quicker, and compound with the improvements of employee ownership. So I'd call those starters, even if they're not as effective.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

I don't know, Joe, maybe it's just that the world we've made here just fundamentally isn't worth participating in? or even living in, for that matter. #beammeupscotty

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago

Nothing will fundamentally change?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Shit like this is why Trump is going to win. Enjoy the peace while it lasts

[–] [email protected] 9 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Peace? Have you looked around?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago

Whatever current have in comparison to what we WILL have is peace.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 9 months ago (4 children)

Peace compared to open genocide and civil war I mean

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 32 points 9 months ago (2 children)

If he were to do something about corporations or hell even individuals owning multiple rental properties and essentially using software as a virtual oligopoly to systemically raise the cost of living maybe us normal people would notice. Or maybe do something about greedflation sucking every last dime from us.

I make 80% more than I did 20 years ago and I feel poorer now than I did then.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I was getting by paycheck-to-paycheck-ish at my last job, worked on some skills, learned some new things, and got a new job that pays a whole lot more. That was 3 years ago, and inflation has put me right back where I was. I heard all these things over the years about "climbing the ladder" but this feels more like trying to climb the down escalator. I'm putting in the work, and doing everything I'm supposed to do, but I'm not getting anywhere.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 9 months ago

I make less than I did 20 years ago plus now I have three kids. I can barely afford to eat.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 9 months ago (2 children)

because my rent got raised over $1200 in the past two years

[–] [email protected] 8 points 9 months ago (5 children)

Jesus!!! I was bitching because mine went up 1000 over the last 10 years. Luckily my wife and were able to buy for what we were paying in rent. Hopefully nothing breaks though. 😕

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago

I was annoyed mine went up $550 in the last 10 years even though it's a great price for the area still

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

Yep the joys of living in a 'high COL' area

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I managed to not get a raise on rent because my landlord forgot that he's raising the prices. Last year he told me that he's raising the price. But when he sent me the invoice for this year, it's still last year's amount. Well, I'm not going to be the one who reminds him.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago

hell yeah never tell him

[–] [email protected] 29 points 9 months ago

The stock market is a measure of how much wealth has been taken from workers.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Let’s see… how much do I pay for in Health insurance each month? How much do houses cost now? How much am I paying in taxes?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 9 months ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

Well more specifically, it's who the taxes are coming from and what they are being used on that's (part of) the problem.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 9 months ago

So why do i know so many people that don't have enough? I didn't used to

[–] [email protected] 44 points 9 months ago

Because his economists aren't treating income & wealth disparity as indicators of economic health.

[–] [email protected] 36 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Doing well for who? His campaign donors? I'm still going to vote for him because the alternative is worse, but all this talk about how well the economy is supposedly doing seems horribly out of touch.

Edit: I really should read the article or at least pay more attention to what website the article is on.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago

Edit: I really should read the article or at least pay more attention to what website the article is on.

I can't access articles on CNN.com because they block me for blocking ads. I'm over here commenting as though I know what the content says but I bet I'm right in my assumption.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›