this post was submitted on 06 Feb 2024
449 points (98.5% liked)

politics

19104 readers
2541 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 14 points 9 months ago (2 children)

One step closer to putting dick cheney in jail for WMD hoax

[–] [email protected] 6 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Rumsfeld was on TV spreading thowe lies, and it was obvious he knew they were lies. He should be the first. But W, there's the fucker who drove the country into that shit show; even before Cheney, Bush Jr. should be in prison for the unwarrented deaths of US soldiers.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

Oh, thank god. I guess I'm glad his passing was such non-news that I missed it.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago (3 children)

I was about to say I'd like to get Cheney in first because W will probably live more years... But Dick may be then next Kissinger, the insufferable fuck that deserves death the most but refuses to die. I mean he already is that but he's not the figurehead yet. Just through them both in stocks forever

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago

It took so long for hell to claim Kissinger. I guess when you sell your soul, the devil can bide his time.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Isn't that walking corpse a fully realized corpse yet?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

Yes, Rumsfeld died in 2021.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 9 months ago (2 children)

We don't really need a bunch of posts about this on the front page.

Keeping this one because it has the most comments and upvotes, locking the others and directing them here.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 9 months ago

I appreciate your work keeping this clean for us

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

What about doing megathreads?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 9 months ago

TBH, it's not a big enough story. The judges ruled, it's getting challenged to the Supreme Court.

The Supreme Court will be megapost worthy and we'll be doing one on Thursday for that hearing.

[–] [email protected] 69 points 9 months ago (1 children)

To think. A bunch of people who despised the king sat down and created the presidency as an act of defiance to monarch rule. You want us to believe that they intended the president to have powers only a king possesses. Get the fuck out.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

Careful, the "Original Intent" line of logic leads to Originalism and you could end up on SCOTUS!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago

Originalism, at least, respects the idea of laws the government is not above.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

The poor liberal judges on the court who have to show up to work knowing their contemporaries are corrupt sleaze bags.

There is nothing wrong with originalism as long as it is not selectively employed. If there is legislation that is behind the times it shouldn't be the court deciding how the law should be written.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago

The problem with a lot of originalist shit is that the people talking about it just selectively apply it where they want. The supreme court will happily apply common law right up until you point out judges in it being tried for corruption. Then suddenly their wars turn off and judicial immunity has just existed forever.

load more comments
view more: next ›