There is no way the virus functioned. Seriously. The guy had no tech background.
this post was submitted on 29 May 2024
137 points (97.2% liked)
Technology
59378 readers
2952 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Computer virus. Okay. Phew.
Though a computer virus could someday be just as deadly as a regular virus.
Even now, deaths can be attributed to hospitals getting ransomware.
Even now, deaths can be attributed to hospitals profiting off completely insecure systems.
What freaked me out were the IV drug dispensers that dialed into wifi for app control (and yes, they're less secure than your roomba).
It'd make a great fictional assassination story if one was commandeered to kill a VIP by morphene or insulin overdose. No such incident has occured yet IRL. But I'm sure it's worth like 20 cyberpunk dystopia points when it does.
You are correct, but I hope we can all agree there is a special place in hell reserved for people who interfere with health workers and cause death in the process.
That's right on par with raping a nun, or a priest diddling a kid in my book.
That's a bit of victim blaming. Yes, everyone can take steps to be more secure, but don't blame them for getting hacked.
That’s true, I agree with this sentiment. But I’m a bit confused when trying to apply the same logic to credit bureaus and other companies which get hacked and expose our personal information without facing any real consequences. In those situations I feel that those companies should be held liable for the breaches.
Apparently the warrant was served only after an discovering evidence from an unrelated (or semi-related?) arrest? The article didn't specify if his ransomware worked, but I doubt it did if it was mostly GPT-generated. I guess the intention and confession is enough to make charges stick though. Wouldn't be surprised if whatever GPT service he used also flagged him as suspicious and led authorities to him.
Japan has a suspiciously high conviction rate though (>99%). They either don't even go for criminals they are not sure about or there's some form of tampering going on. Hard to say.
They have (or had) a suspiciously high confession rate too.
Apparently it's the former. Their prosecution rate is 8% apparently according to Wikipedia, because they're too understaffed to deal with cases that can go either way. They also have a false confession problem, but that's not what's getting them to that rate.
The conviction rate is 99.3%. By only stating this high conviction rate it is often misunderstood as too high—however, this high conviction rate drops significantly when accounting for the fact that Japanese prosecutors drop roughly half the cases they are given. If measured in the same way, the United States' federal conviction rate would be 99.8%.[14][15][16]
From wikipedia.
Comparing Japan to a prison colony makes it look a little more reasonable.
I don't agree with most western philosophies of prison, the US is probably the worst amongst them (but most of that comes at the state level), I was just highlighting that Japan isn't in some way uniquely bad for 'western' law systems. Indeed, conviction rate is a really hard stat to do any sort of apples to apples comparison for because different countries count and report it different ways.
Should have asked AI how to avoid getting caught
Nice try, FBI
-- GPT4