The comms on this have been an absolute nightmare and that's honestly more worrying to me than whether it's £28 billion or £18 billion, or an aspiration, or a ceiling, or whatever.
Get it together! You're meant to be a government-in-waiting!
this post was submitted on 06 Feb 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)
UK Politics
3070 readers
83 users here now
General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both [email protected] and [email protected] .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.
Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.
Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.
If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)
Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.
Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.
[email protected] appears to have vanished! We can still see cached content from this link, but goodbye I guess! :'(
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Oh dear Frank. Are you finally losing faith in Keir's Labour?
I have the same view I always have. The comms are bad. This has been the case for a century, bar the era known as the Mandelson Hegemony and the still briefer era known to historians as Mandelson Redux.
Mandelson
Ah yes Cash for Honours Mandelson. What a decent, upstanding fellow. You strike me as a Champaign Socialist Frank. A man who's never sene true hardship.
To you "crushing orphans" is just words on a screen. To me it's loved ones dying. You need to feel true misery to understand my heart and the hearts of real left wingers like me.
I take it you're the one true Scotsman?
Labour really need to give some clarity. I get they want to keep their cards close until nearer the election, but the messaging so far seems frustratingly wishy washy. A political narrative still needs a sound foundation to build on.
This is the best summary I could come up with:
Keir Starmer has said Labour’s policy pledge to spend £28bn a year on green investment is “desperately needed,” as he re-opened an issue that has become a source of tension in the party.
The Labour leader said in an interview with Times Radio that he had been “unwavering” in relation to the party’s green energy plans and denied he was “scaling back” policies as this year’s general election looms.
Zoë Billingham, the director of the IPPR North thinktank, said on X after Starmer’s comments emerged: “It’s reassuring that @UKLabour have recommitted to their £28bn green investment pledge.
Opposition to watering down the £28bn commitment has come from across the spectrum, uniting Labour MPs from the party’s left with others in the centre, while business leaders have also thrown their weight behind it.
They included Jürgen Maier, the former UK head of Siemens, the German industrial giant and major investor, who said last week that the proposed investment of £28bn a year in the low-carbon economy was an “absolute minimum”.
But they added that the party would in effect cut its green ambitions by about two-thirds, given that the previously announced schemes are set to cost just under £10bn a year by the end of the parliament.
The original article contains 529 words, the summary contains 206 words. Saved 61%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!
And now after the leaking of dropping the pledge has bombed..... it's back! 😁
I'm glad he's rethinking it, it would have been desperately sad to have dropped it. But this is how politics work these days in the UK. Leak a policy, deny it, quietly gauge public opinion, revise policy. It's the only way you can test the waters it seems.