this post was submitted on 24 May 2024
143 points (98.6% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5240 readers
599 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

It's a serious policy failure that this is happening; the people paying to cap wells should be the ones who became wealthy by extracting the oil, not a bunch of random teenagers.

all 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

Next week: Teens become rich by adopting oil well.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Getting industry to cap the wells is a hard problem that is being solved, but more slowly than it should be. The problem is these wells were drilled and used when they were producing a lot by massive companies with lots of profits.

Then, when they were less profitable, they were sold to smaller companies with much tighter margins. Then those small companies can't continue to operate them without losing money and they don't have enough money to cap the wells, so they abandon them.

If we ask the smaller companies to cap the wells, they'll go bankrupt, stop buying wells, and disappear. I don't have a problem with this outcome necessarily, but it won't get the wells capped because the companies will go bankrupt instead of paying and it will consolidate all oil and gas power to the big companies (close to the current state of affairs, for sure, but this would basically be absolute).

Ideally the big companies that drilled and used the majority of the oil from the well would pay, but mergers and acquisitions can often make that difficult.

For now, states are working to require funds be set aside ahead of time to pay for future well caps and are working to pay to cap abandoned wells directly, which is expensive, but could come from increased industry fees and taxes.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Privatized profits socialized losses

[–] [email protected] 13 points 5 months ago

And...

"We're the cleanup crew for a party we were too young to attend." - Kevin Gilbert, from a song on the album Thud

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 months ago (3 children)

This is definitely going to sound counterproductive, but I think they should have kept the first well they acquired and as a source of income and then used that income to buy and shut down other wells, then cap it.
Make the oil finance its own demise.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago

Or drilling rights should come with a required deposit that will pay for the capping once done.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 months ago

These oil wells are available because they are not profitable, and often because they cost more to run than they could possibly produce.