this post was submitted on 23 May 2024
0 points (NaN% liked)

rpg

3062 readers
1 users here now

This community is for meaningful discussions of tabletop/pen & paper RPGs

Rules (wip):

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago

WOTC could offer to come suck me off and still wouldn't give them a fuckin dime. Fuck you Hasbro, you lazy sacks of shit wanted to have intellectual rights to work you didn't create just because it's in a rule system you have some IP in. You forever burned the bridge for me.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

2024 ruleset? Is that a 6e? A 5.5?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

No, it is the 2024 version of the 5th edition rules. Supposedly fully compatible with existing adventures, and not breaking existing characters.

I expect people will refer to it as 5.5, or 5.2, or anything except '2024'. But we'lll see...

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Is this the one where they tried to remove "racism" from a make-believe world with fantasy races?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Among other things, yes. Some things I have seen do strike me as logical tweaks and fixes much like 3.5 was to 3e, but some are clearly attempts at "fixing" PR problems by people who don't understand why they're having those problems in the first place. And at least in some cases I expect are personally responsible for said PR problems. It's kind and like a Three Stooges skit about corporate mismanagement, but they honestly think they're doing a good job.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago

I haven't played that variation, but I didn't like what I read about it. For one, I like that the races are different. World of Warcraft homogenized the races and later the classes, and it took so much character away from the game. There was no longer a reason to build a diverse party, anything would work. It makes sense for the D&D races to be different and have different benefits and drawbacks, they're from massively different backgrounds and environments. It makes sense for people to be wary of Loth Sworn Drow, when they're pledged to an evil spider queen that demands dominion over everyone else. They're literally evil. Trying to insert real world political concerns into a fantasy game is really annoying to me, especially when I retreat into that game to get away from the real world and all of its concerns.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

...it's as substantive a revision from fifth edition as the second edition was from AD+D: id est yeah, sixth edition, but the new SRD will be labelled 5.2...

(marketing calls it D+D 50; marketing called fifth edition dungeons & dragons, no version number)

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Just finish dying already. I’m sick and tired of this drama. Everybody and their grandma has a better product and their shit keeps getting free exposure.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It's been so frustrating seeing people on YouTube and wherever who have spent the past 18 months "spotlighting" and "advocating for playing" other systems climb all over each other to praise this move. A move that does nothing but tell 3rd party publishers that they can safely go back to ignoring Shadowrun, Pathfinder, and OSR games.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago

Maybe if those games had more appealing rule systems, other publishers would make products using them.

load more comments
view more: next ›