copacetic

joined 1 year ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 days ago

You definitely can do without a language spec. I heard in aerospace another approach is common: They use whatever compiler and then verify the binary. That means different tradeoffs of course.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 days ago (2 children)

In SIL world, the C++ issues would not be considered bugs but maybe change requests.

The SIL philosophy (as far as I know it from ASIL) is "unsafe unless convinced otherwise". That seems like a good idea when the lifes of humans are on the line. Without a spec how would you argue that a system/product is safe?

(Aside: Software in itself cannot be safe or unsafe because without hardware it cannot do anything. Safety must be assessed holistically including hardware and humans.)

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 days ago

Fair enough. In practice, we resolve it recursively with a higher level specs and at some point it is just "someone wants that". In commercial software development (where SIL is used) that is a customer who pays for it or some executive.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 days ago

Welcome to the real world. /s

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 days ago (7 children)

The specification does not make anything happen but it enables you to say "the implementation is wrong". Of course, you can say that without a spec as well but what does "wrong" mean then? It just means you personally disagree with its behavior. When "wrong" means "inconsistent with the spec" everybody involved can work with more clarity and fewer assumptions. Wrong assumptions can kill people flying rockets.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 days ago

Crates.io has tags like scripting. It suggests languages like rhai, dyon, or rune.

 

Temo didn't figure his vote for President Donald Trump would affect them personally. That was before the enforcement of Mr. Trump's "zero tolerance" policy toward illegal immigrants.

 
 
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago

Better append /s

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago

I think, as GM, the art is what questions to ask.

The GM should keep control of the discussion. There is a big difference between open questions like "what are vampires in this world?" and closed questions like "what is the name of the vampire queen?" It depends on the group how open questions can be without everything devolving into insanity.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago

Yes. Mausritter also uses the 2-page format a lot and I also like it there.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 weeks ago

at this time

Hm, maybe it was intended as a warning to his own company like "get your shit together, there is a threat emerging".

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

I’m confused. I assume they didn’t let them publish that by accident, so what does Ford try to achieve here?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Nice work! Here is my quick brain dump:

  • trumpets for an announcement
  • horses riding
  • goblins cackling
  • force field / magic sizzling

By the way, isn't the light-dark switch inverted?

view more: next ›