this post was submitted on 11 May 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

Map Enthusiasts

3451 readers
2 users here now

For the map enthused!

Rules:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

The change from 1800 to 1950 is mostly caused by soap, and the change from 1950 to 2015 by penicilline and the Haber process.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Not even. The biggest change is due to crazy high infant mortality rates no longer drastically reducing the average

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Yes, and what caused the reduction in infant mortality?

Soap. Or rather the revolutionary idea that it would be good if doctors and midwives used it.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago

Which was largely due to the introduction of soap and hygiene practices during childbirth.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago

Do not forget vaccines.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

How is Australia doing so good? Half the things there are trying to kill you!

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Why is Canada doing better than the US?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago

In 2015, single payer healthcare

Today, infant and maternal mortality

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago

Single-payer healthcare not tied to employment?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

This is less interesting than standard deviation, percentage living to 50/60/70/80, or life expectancy for men/women and at 1/5/18 years old though, as the issue here is it's hard to tell what is from things like dying in childbirth for both the child & mother and dying as a young child, vs being able to live longer, as we know people have lived well into their 80s and 90s since records began (ie Ancient Greece/Egypt/Sumeria) but this data implies that everyone used to die at 30, when in reality there were likely 2 peaks at 0-5 and 60-80

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago

this data implies that everyone used to die at 30

No, it doesn't. Unless you don't know what life expectancy means.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago

Would be interesting to see 1800 controlled for child mortality.