I think you are over complicating things. Just get an HDMI audio extractor (HDCP compliant), feed the audio into an audio compressor/limitor, then you can run the audio into your speakers or buy an HDMI audio injector to feed back into your TV.
this post was submitted on 05 May 2024
46 points (91.1% liked)
Privacy
31915 readers
517 users here now
A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.
Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.
In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.
Some Rules
- Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn't great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
- Don't promote proprietary software
- Try to keep things on topic
- If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
- Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
- Be nice :)
Related communities
Chat rooms
-
[Matrix/Element]Dead
much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
why would you want to compress all of your audio. It would make normal content sound terrible
I'm pretty sure the compression is amplitude compression, just making it quieter not data compression. All the audio information will remain, just volume changed
yeah it still sounds like dog water
Audio compressors do not compress all of your audio. Please refer to the graph in my original comment.
You could try an hdmi audio extractor and pipe that into a raspberry pi with the appropriate hat and run a real-time volume normalization dsp then run from the pi to your sound system or BACK into some hdmi encoder.
Probably run into major issues with delayed audio though.
lol hdcp will absolutely fuck you over with this one.
Isn't HDCP crap? If I remember correctly it's extremely easy to buy HDCP compliant splitters and stuff that just strips all protection.
yep but without that hardware good luck
Well yea, the solution is buying that hardware. Which should be pretty damn easy.
Sure, I guess it's a hard problem unless you have the easy solution. Fortunately the easy solution is easy.
Some AV Processors include a night mode or loudness processing that attempts to normalize the levels. In practice, the levels will lower some, but perhaps not enough to alleviate the problem.
You could try reporting the provider, but it's likely their legal team would argue the CALM act doesn't apply to them. Come to think of it, the FCC may not have ever formalized the rules still...
That’s the act I was thinking of. I’m almost certain web streamers will say it doesn’t apply to them…..and it’s definitely one of those things you’d take for granted until you hit the “new” streaming medium and realize why it was necessary in the first place.
You can get an unencrypted hdmi out by using a splitter. I do this to record video with camlink. This is the splitter I use between a dedicated device like a firetv and the camlink: https://a.co/d/clpveZh
take the hdmi stream from my Apple TV
I think there's two big obstacles here: HDCP and processing power. Most legal devices you can buy will not support simply handing over HDCP-unecrypted raw frames for you to mess with as that defeats the whole point of HDCP.
But even if you get past that, you're going to need at least a very high speed FPGA or ASIC, optionally also connected to a reasonably high-end PC, in order to be able to modify the stream in real-time and send it back out... certainly no current rpi can do this in even 1080p in real-time, and many devices now are going to 4k and beyond.
in order to be able to modify the stream in real-time and send it back out...
It doesn't need to modify. What it needs is detection, and then either blacking it out, or replacing with a simple progesssbar-like screen on a black background.
I consider "blacking it out" and "replacing" to be equivalent to "modify" in this case as you still need basically the same amount of processing power to do any of it.
As OP said volume leveling is acceptable, something like this will do.
Modifying HDMI video signal is simply impossible due to DMCA and bla bla bla. But not all hope is lost though. You can overlay opaque video on top of another encrypted stream via this little box. This is an old project per se and I have no idea if still available, but with some dirty work you might able to detect the increase of volume or match of an algo or something with a total black screen overlay on top.
Yes those are FPGA/ASIC based solutions like I mentioned. That should work for 1080p at least, but getting to 4k is still prohibitively expensive.
impossible
My understanding is the DMCA explicitly allows reverse engineering of encryption for interoperability purposes... the only problem is that would have to specifically be tested in court to know if the government would agree in this instance, and nobody wants to try it.
Overlay isn't transcoding. All it need is a muxer like MKVToolNix. I doubt it need much processing power.
Muxing has nothing to do with HDMI
It doesn't and I didn't ever mentioned HDMI in my reply. Just doubt if overlaying another encrypted stream with a muxer ever need that much processing power to the point of "prohibitively expensive".
Encrypted streams also don't have anything to do with a muxer, I really don't understand what you're trying to say. Muxers are for handling file formats, which is not being discussed at all, this is about raw video frame processing in hardware.
Well, I'm simply reciting what is described on the page based on my understanding. From the diagram, it does not do raw frame processing from the source (assuming HDMI w/ HDCP) as the stream remains encrypted. By the look of it, it is copy or passthrough to the muxer (as it labeled). With some magic, it muxes two encrypted streams into one and output to the video sink. How is that done I have no idea.
That diagram is describing the hardware side of the NeTV, which is an FPGA device doing all this. That "mux" is describing a hardware 2:1 mux on the raw video streams, such as https://vlsiverify.com/verilog/verilog-codes/multiplexer/
The "magic" is described here: https://www.bunniestudios.com/blog/2011/implementation-of-mitm-attack-on-hdcp-secured-links/
Got it. I can see where the problem is niw and how can the hardware is limiting. Thanks for the great article.
Yeah I think hdcp and reprocessing would be most difficult. There are hdmi splitter devices like those used for coloured bias lighting that I think could be used….similarly I think the processing actually isn’t unsolvable, it’s not much different than object detection from a live camera stream. I agree re-encoding the stream would be too hardware intensive for anything “cheap” like a pi, hence the secondary device control alternative initially, but analyzing the stream should be possible.
If this pisses you off so much that you think about processing the HDMI streams, why don't you directly go to sail the high seas?
Because I think this could be neat product…..kinda like PiKVM, but maybe using ML to detect ads and make it a nice community tool to block in a device independent way. like hardware Adblock.
So you came here with zero technical expertise or knowledge about the situation, and asking for specific steps on how to do this in order to make a product? 😂🤣🤦 Hope there was some profit sharing involved somewhere.
How would ML detect ads? Do you know the difference between ML and CV? You may want to start there.
Get a Pihole or AdGuard endpoint and hope for the best if all you want is to remove ads.
So you came here with zero technical expertise or knowledge about the situation, and asking for specific steps on how to do this in order to make a product?
no need to be rude
I've got an android TV with jellyfin. That's the best against your problem.