this post was submitted on 02 May 2024
501 points (98.8% liked)

Technology

59271 readers
3629 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

In February, HouseFresh managing editor Gisele Navarro called out publishers like BuzzFeed and Rolling Stone as some of the culprits that publish content about air purifiers despite a lack of expertise — but Google rewards these sites with high rankings all the same. The result is a search results page filled with SEO-first content, designed to do not much more than rank highly on Google.

In a piece published today, she says HouseFresh has “virtually disappeared” from search results: search traffic has decreased 91 percent in recent months, from around 4,000 visitors a day in October 2023 to 200 a day today.

“We lost rankings we held for months (and sometimes years) for articles that are constantly being updated and improved based on findings from our first-hand and in-depth testing, our long-term experience with the products, and feedback from our readers,” Navarro writes. “Our article [previously ranked at #2] is now buried deep beneath sponsored posts, Quora advice from 2016, best-of lists from big media sites, and no less than 64 Google Shopping product listings. Sixty. Four.”

SEO-first affiliate content is being deployed ruthlessly at countless sites.

There is no obvious editorial necessity for Forbes to write articles like “Top 20 Largest Dog Breeds” or “What Fruits Can Dogs Eat?” — until you take a look at the sidebar of these stories, which are filled with dozens of affiliate links for pet insurance that Forbes gets a kickback from every time someone signs up.

Last year, when CNET was discovered to be using artificial intelligence tools to produce dozens of stories, it was SEO-heavy “evergreen” articles it focused on first. In the cases of Sports Illustrated and USA Today’s AI content debacles, it also was product reviews that were being churned out using automation tools.

The aggressive targeting of top Google search spots — with or without AI — by big media outlets affects small sites like HouseFresh the most. A significant loss of traffic for independent publishers is often enough to shutter an outlet entirely.

(page 2) 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 15 points 6 months ago (5 children)

I'm using a French search engine called Qwant. I find it gives very good results.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Really need to start using DuckDcukGo exclusively

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Make a search on Bing, then make a search on DuckDcukGo. Compare the results. You'll find out that DuckDcukGo is just a front end for another site that provides links to business affiliates.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago (4 children)

Well damn what engine search CAN I use then?

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 27 points 6 months ago (3 children)

Duck Duck Go is also complete trash these days, just in different ways.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago (4 children)

yeah I tried it and it was incredibly lacking. Any advice on alternatives?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I've been using Qwant and been loving it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I sadly have none. I suffer with DDG and Google and my life is hell.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 33 points 6 months ago (1 children)

um

Original Article Here

Verge is generally a good site, but this article adds nothing

[–] [email protected] 19 points 6 months ago

Probably the best thing about Verge covering this is simply signal boost, getting the story out to a wider audience.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 6 months ago

Do people who don't follow this kind of stuff realize how dog shit google results have gotten? I accidentally googled (new phone) a Costco wine earlier and all the links were marketing garbage. DDG gives me actual reviews within 5 results.

[–] [email protected] 49 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (4 children)

Paging FTC, FTC. It's gotten near impossible to find honest reviews that aren't driven by affiliate links anywhere. So many news outlets hocking products outright, I stopped paying attention after nyt bought wirecutter.

Then there's shit like Forbes (from the article) writing lifestyle clickbait about pets and dogs all the while advertising pet insurance.

"who do you trust, when everyone's a crook?" -'revolution calling' (queensryche)

How 16 Companies are Dominating the World’s Google Search Results (2024 Edition)

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Operation Mindcrime is a gem!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

It is one of my favorites too:)

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 101 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (6 children)

I want a search engine addon that allows blacklists, specifically ones that block every site that pumps out AI generated stories, preferably crowd-sourced. CNET would be the first one.
I’m sick of the internet at its current state, and it’s visibly getting worse day to day. I don’t even know how to search for shit and recommendations when planning to buy something.

[–] [email protected] 34 points 6 months ago (1 children)

This is exactly why people started appending "site:www.reddit.com" to their searches. It was much easier (but not guaranteed) to find organic discussion and reviews of products.

Of course, nothing gold can stay, and this tarnish appeared by way of pigfucker Spez making Reddit worse by allowing corporations to flood the site with bots in the name of boosting MAUs for the IPO. That said, I can appreciate the position Google is in- how do you get to be a search engine of such size that your users can trust your results you deliver to them, filter out SEO spam, and have the whole system automated due to costs?

Or rather, I would appreciate that position, if Google were more interested in quality search results than in spam advertising.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 6 months ago

Have a look at marginalia.nu - it's like a return to the old days

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

So you want Kagi

[–] [email protected] 34 points 6 months ago (3 children)

Kagi is a paid search engine. It allows you to uprank or downrank specific webpages. In that sense it's very powerful.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

I’ve heard of it but I don’t like the idea of having search queries associated with my credit card, even though they say they don’t do that.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 6 months ago (3 children)

But if you don't pay directly for a good search engine, aren't they forced to use ads to fund it? And then you end up with Google. Or is there a third option?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 months ago

they can give an option to use anonymous forms of payment. Credit card only is aggressively anti privacy

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago

Didn’t think this through, did I… But DDG works for now

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›