this post was submitted on 24 Jan 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19144 readers
5016 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago (2 children)

I bet you the Railroad Unions aren't. He told them to get fucked and get back to work.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

They actually got what they wanted with Biden's help.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago (2 children)

They literally said he helped them great and they were satisfied bruh

[–] [email protected] -1 points 9 months ago

Union Leadership said he helped them, the same one that is now stabbing labor in the back with an endorsement.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Thanks bruh. I'm sure the actual workers would disagree.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

Got any proof of that then, bruh?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Now this is some leopards ate my face

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago (2 children)

I'm with you--folks already forget what he did with the rail workers?

Endorsing Trump would be ridiculous, but how about the unions endorse no one--can that be a thing?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago (2 children)

You mean when he support the rail workers and fought congress undermining them? Why do leftist want to rewrite history to ensure people think it isn't a W for Biden and labor rights?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Any win by a liberal is a threat to the leftists, since their argument is based on the inability of liberals to govern

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Yeah dude we get it, you hate liberals. Unfortunately you need them to get anything of material benefit done for working class people and minorities.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

I was agreeing with you, I should have said "the perceived inability of liberals to govern"

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

Apologies, I missed the intention in my fervor lol

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

This comment is so disingenuous. Your link said guaranteed sick leave was the sticking point in December 2022:

The initial agreement brokered by the Biden administration was accepted by all but four rail unions, who were holding out for guaranteed paid sick leave days. The opposing unions, though, represent the majority of rail workers. The workers and companies had until Dec. 9 to reach an agreement before they vowed to strike, which the industry estimated would cost the U.S. economy $2 billion per day.

But five months later, it was resolved:

When Joe Biden and Congress enacted legislation in December that blocked a threatened freight rail strike, many workers angrily faulted Biden for not ensuring that the legislation also guaranteed paid sick days. But since then, union officials says, members of the Biden administration, including the transportation secretary, Pete Buttigieg, and labor secretary, Marty Walsh, who stepped down on 11 March, lobbied the railroads, telling them it was wrong not to grant paid sick days.

https://www.theguardian.com/business/2023/may/01/railroad-workers-union-win-sick-leave

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (3 children)

Yea, five months after he very publicly shut down the strike, they quietly got a small part of what they were asking for. This isn't the w you think it is

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Are you in a union? If not I'd understand why your upset. Anyone who is in one recognizes how good biden has been for labor in this country. Probably the best labor president since FDR even.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago
[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago

Then what is it? What happened? What are your sources? Substituting reality because you disagree with it will get you nowhere, champ.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

Looks like a W to workers. Let's ask the rail workers who have increases of 24% how they like their new contract.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 9 months ago

I assume this is the UAW leadership seeing that Biden would be better than trump, and so endorsing accordingly.