this post was submitted on 29 Apr 2024
1122 points (98.4% liked)

Political Memes

5234 readers
2170 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 20 points 4 months ago (2 children)

I had a boss once who avoided paying taxes on his 49' sailing yacht by "donating" it to his church. It was then technically owned by the church (so no taxes, either transfer or property) but he still used it exclusively.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 months ago

Religious country

[–] [email protected] 25 points 4 months ago

You can probably report that to the IRS right now.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 4 months ago

Teachers shouldn't be paying for teaching supplies in the first place.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 4 months ago

Well, have a party or three with businesses clients on the yacht and you can write that off. However, I think the vast majority of people have their yachts registered under shell corporations, and that opens up a lot of opportunities for writeoffs.

[–] [email protected] 35 points 4 months ago (2 children)

This is just plain incorrect.

The law doesn't allow CEOs to write off yachts.

Whether or not regulators investigate them is another matter.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 4 months ago

That's why they don't own the yachts, but they own the charter companies that run the yachts.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Can't they just buy in the name of a company, which would be a 'business expense', which is kind of a write off?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 months ago (1 children)

It doesn't work like that. Expenses need to be "necessarily incurred in the course of producing income". Just be cause a company pays for something doesn't make it tax deductible.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago

I can't have a yacht business meeting without a yacht now can I?

[–] [email protected] 11 points 4 months ago (2 children)

They would have to justify how it is a part of the companies operations. In theory at least.

So a private jet to fly your execs to business meets? Ok.

A yacht? Maybe for entertaining customers? I don't know about the US, but here in Australia entertainment expenses are written off at a lower rate than other business expenses.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

here in Australia entertainment expenses are written off at a lower rate than other business expenses.

Sorry mate. Not really correct.

If an Australian company pays for entertainment expenses for staff, it's considered a fringe benefit and fringe benefits tax is payable. It equates to almost the cost of the actual expense. So if a company pays $10k for an employee to take a holiday, they'll have to pay almost $10k in fringe benefits tax, but they do get a deduction for the whole $20k, which will save them $5k in income tax.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, so to simplify, written off at a different rate.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Not really, at all.

It's written off at the same rate, while being subject to a whole other type of tax, which means the company pays more tax, rather than less.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Ok, so the point I was originally trying to make was that claiming a yacht as an entertainment expense was less attractive. Would you agree?

[–] [email protected] -4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

If sticking a fork in your eye is "less attractive" than eating icecream then sure.

... but let's be honest, that's not what you were trying to say. You were just plain wrong. Get over it. No one cares.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago

The only one who can't admit they were wrong here is you.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago

A yacht can have meeting rooms, you can receive clients in these meeting rooms for business purposes, making it therefore a business expense.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 4 months ago (1 children)

If I were a teacher, I would not buy school supplies with my own money.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The unfortunate part is that then kids in your class would be missing out on school supplies. It's not right for teachers to use their own money for school supplies though.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

That would be the schools and the parents problem. It would present a challenge to my job to find a way to teach without supplies, but I’d rather do that then spend my own money on my job.

Edit: whoever is downvoting, I hope you spend your paycheck on your job

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

super yachts need a hole drilled

Scuba gear and a drill

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago

Scuba diver and sailor here. Above a certain size, boats have watertight bulkheads and pumps to remove water, like fire hose levels of water. May I suggest a thermal lance? Works great underwater, cuts through metal better than a drill, and can cut a slice long enough to cut past multiple bulkheads.

load more comments
view more: next ›