this post was submitted on 28 Apr 2024
3 points (100.0% liked)

General Discussion

12046 readers
1 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy.World General!

This is a community for general discussion where you can get your bearings in the fediverse. Discuss topics & ask questions that don't seem to fit in any other community, or don't have an active community yet.


πŸͺ† About Lemmy World


🧭 Finding CommunitiesFeel free to ask here or over in: [email protected]!

Also keep an eye on:

For more involved tools to find communities to join: check out Lemmyverse!


πŸ’¬ Additional Discussion Focused Communities:


Rules

Remember, Lemmy World rules also apply here.0. See: Rules for Users.

  1. No bigotry: including racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia.
  2. Be respectful. Everyone should feel welcome here.
  3. Be thoughtful and helpful: even with β€˜silly’ questions. The world won’t be made better by dismissive comments to others on Lemmy.
  4. Link posts should include some context/opinion in the body text when the title is unaltered, or be titled to encourage discussion.
  5. Posts concerning other instances' activity/decisions are better suited to [email protected] or [email protected] communities.
  6. No Ads/Spamming.
  7. No NSFW content.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago

jxl can also do lossless compression and transparency, so the important features of png are there

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago (2 children)

There's not much to improve on PNG. It's essentially a zipped up BMP with optional filters to rearrange pixels in a way that will hopefully lead to better compression at the zip stage.

Last time I tested this, if you used xz or zstd to compress a BMP with max settings, it made smaller files than PNG.

WebP and JXL is where it's at.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Experts warn the obesity epidemic may require adoption of JpegXXL standard, at least for American selfies.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

ny PNG elitist brain interprets this as PNG being so good than JpeG had to be upgraded and a new format (WebP)

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

WebP solves use cases for both PNG and JPEG as the same format can be lossless or lossy, while getting the benefits of a much more powerful codec.

PNG is good for certain types of graphics. Take a full size 48MP picture and encode it in PNG and it's going to be massive compared to JPEG.

PNG is a pretty simple and effective format but it's not especially good nowadays, there's a reason WebP is popular. Much smaller files for the same quality. Same for JPEG XL.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago

Webp = google = convert to PNG

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Jpeg xl is pretty good and I'm still pissed Google deleted it from Chromium before it could even try to get any market share.

Jpeg xl can do everything jpeg & png can do, but more efficiently.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago

Google makes some really fuckin bullshit decisions. Jpeg XL being removed from chrome, same with DHCPv6 missing in android. I hate google

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago
[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago (2 children)

bro, we have enough image formats. thank you

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago

what the bomboclat you talking abt?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago (2 children)

No we don't. We are my animated PNGs?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Sweet! Is it universally supported, though? Can I use it with Firefox, Safari and Chrome?