this post was submitted on 26 Apr 2024
300 points (97.2% liked)

politics

19072 readers
3977 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago

Make Dog Murderers Great Again

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago

What is, the opposite of John Wick, Alex?

[–] [email protected] 11 points 6 months ago

I’m guessing she’s “pro life”.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

On a hunting trip? I heard it killed chickens and bit the governor, how did all of this happen on a hunting trip?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

Hunting wild chickens on the governor's hunting grounds, obv.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 6 months ago (3 children)

This is a common rural mentality. Animals are utilitarian and those who fail to be useful or prove to be a nuisance are a waste of resources. "useless eaters"

Unless you're vegan (and I'm not), you participate in this kind of cruelty, even if you happen to be a few degrees removed from it.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Having grown up and still have the majority of my family live in rural areas, you're correct in that there's a mentality that animals are tools, a means to an end. But I don't think many with that mentality will be forgiving of her for this.

With that mentality there is also a general understanding that these are "dumb animals" who can and will fuck up and especially hunting dogs need a lot of training. A dog who fails the training isn't usually put down, just either given some less strict job, kept as a pet or put up for adoption. Taking her at her word, it sounds like the dog had killed some chickens and had turned towards her and tried biting. But being the dog was only 14 months old, sounds like it had an excited temperament and hadn't learned just how much bigger than other animals it truly is. Hardly a reason to kill an animal, even if it was just raised as a tool.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago

14 months is still a puppy. What a piece of shit.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

Do you want to be vegan?

[–] [email protected] 16 points 6 months ago

Kristi Noem is a despicable cunt. I hope she stubs a minimum of one toe every day for the rest of her miserable life.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 6 months ago (3 children)

I'm not sure I understand the logic of her even telling this story. So like if she finds herself unable to "train" a disobedient state judiciary or something, is she saying that this is her plan B?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 6 months ago

It seems like a failure on multiple fronts. For the magabrained types, she was both unable to train a dog to hunt AND is apparently a bad shot and terrible at handling guns.

For the normal Americans, she just comes off like a psycho.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 6 months ago

She's as out of touch of being able to train her dog as she is to be a representative of the State. When we voted to legalize weed, she made a sheriff start a lawsuit to block it on a BS technicality. Used citizen tax dollars against the will of the people who pay them.

More directly, this boast is more of anger issues being attempted of changing the narritive to "go getter attitude." Don't know details of the book, but how this article cites it seems more they she lost her shit over a puppy (honestly being a puppy) killing a neighbor's chicken (not specified if dog was loose or chicken got out), and even that didn't satiate her anger, she went and killed a goat for doing goat things (fertile male who was territorial.)

Honestly, her willingness to be a piece of shit (for various things, feel free to read her wikipedia) is a garner for attention from the worst parts of the GOP to only advance herself, because that's all who she cares about.

[–] [email protected] 41 points 6 months ago

Right? “I failed to train my dog and it killed a chicken while we were hunting birds, so I had to murder it.”

Okay, sorry your dog killed a bird while you were trying to get it to kill a different type of bird? You either didn’t train it well enough or it made an innocent mistake… not a reason to kill it

[–] [email protected] 22 points 6 months ago (1 children)

She probably thinks telling this story will be sure to clinch trump's VP slot for herself.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 6 months ago (2 children)

I don't think this story would alienate her from the MAGA base. Conservatives love the aesthetics of farm life/hunting, doing the dirty work, etc. We're talking about people who defended "grab her by the pussy".

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago

This screams of a performative princess that had no idea how to train a dog.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Even Republicans have dogs and love them. I think on balance this will hurt her, even from her base. People who like their dogs (if they hear about it) will be disgusted.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

Not only that, but she comes off like a complete dumbass when it comes to handling guns. Even idtiot gun-fondlers probably noticed that, but might have to deal with the cognitive dissonance later...

[–] [email protected] 12 points 6 months ago (2 children)

But you see, only trump's opinion matters, and trump hates dogs. If he picks her, magats will fall in line and come up with rationalizations that what she did was good.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

Even Hitler loved dogs. If this comes to pass, the magats won't even have that going for them.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Not saying it's right, but most people feel more attachment to their dogs than to strangers (immigrants, queers, liberals etc). So while there will definitely be maga people who still support her, what I'm saying is on average, more people who might otherwise be supporters will be disturbed.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I think you're right that they'd be disturbed. But I think their cognitive dissonance will overcome that and they'll rationalize it in whatever way they need to to see it as acceptable, because in their eyes trump never makes a mistake or does anything wrong.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago

THIS. They will go crazy(ier) from the cognitive dissonance but they'll probably champion donnie/Kristi kind of thinking, calling dog owners "woke" and SJW, etc...

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Isn't that felony animal abuse?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Sadly, if you don’t cause the animal undue pain (a clean shot almost certainly is not legally considered to cause undue pain, but noem didn’t do that…), you’re totally allowed to kill your pets at any time. I would definitely prefer that people who kill their pets (for reasons other than mercy/safety) are separated from the rest of society than people who shoplift, but alas.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago

TIL. Thanks....terrible to know, but thanks for clarifying.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 6 months ago

Kristi Noem is a fucking monster & the world will be a better place when she is a footnote in the wastepaper basket of political history.

load more comments
view more: next ›