Think of all the politicians he'll have to arrest
politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
Going to be throwing a lot of people in jail then.
Oh lord another "christian nationalist" nutjob with severe mental problems. If he wants to persecute evildoers, he needs to start by putting a clamp over his own monsterous mouth.
It is NOT morality to condemn pornography. In fact, I believe it's far more idiotic and immoral not to watch "porn" (which I wish didn't have a name with such negative connotations to it). People put effort and money into making that s#it for our enjoyment (mostly us males, I admit, but it's there for everyone to enjoy).
They found cave paintings in Lescoux that show cavemen sex with animals and other humans, including kids. My point here is that "porn," which is a term that usually just refers to sexual congress between human beings, has existed FOR A REASON as long as human beings have been around.
I know it's not fashionable, "christian," or polite to make a statement supporting the viewing of sexual pleasure as a necessary part of life, but I hold with Larry Flynt's view of "relax people, it's JUST sex." The idea that human sexuality is sinful is perhaps the most evil idea ever perpetrated by man.
The one impulsive, pleasurable and inexpensive joy we have being labelled a sin and wrong is, to me, the real crime here. I'm not saying porn doesn't sometimes create victims, but for every instance of that, there are billions more who enjoy it and are not harmed but in fact are uplifted and given a healthy outlet because of it.
Something to think about - just sayin'.
When will conservatives realize that what people behind closed doors is none of their business?
No. Traditionally, people were nosey as hell! This is one instance of a conservative actually being conservative.
Why must HIS morality be EVERYONE'S morality? What gives him the right to decide that for me?
This dude definitely watches porn, and is most likely into the weirdest fetishes.
It's unusually the ones that bring this shit up that have the most experience in this department.
Well guess I'm getting the death penalty. You can have my porn when you pry it from my cold dead hands.
Oklahoma lawmaker Dusty Deevers is a hardcore Christian nationalist
Again, separation of church and state is a myth...
I think that's our biggest problem right now. All of these religious assholes who somehow get into government positions.
somehow get into government positions
It's no great mystery. The rightwing show up to vote reliably. The leftwing complain online and get mad at each other for not marching in lockstep.
Well now we know what he likes to do during his free time.
I've got fifty cents that says this dude watches an extraordinary amount of gay porn and somehow he thinks that is shameful. It isn't, but he thinks it is.
Blasphemous cunt.
SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE
That’s not a phrase they’ve heard before.
Donate to the Satanic Temple. They’re fighting this fight for us by challenging these assholes.
just build a wall around the state of oklahoma, don't let anyone out. done.
lol great. Now we just need hackers to hack every republican device, so that at least ⅔ of the party ends up in jail.
Two thirds? Damn you're optimistic. More like 90%. I'd guess about a third of those would be looking at jail time if their porn was revealed even if regular porn wasn't made illegal. Remember with Republicans every accusation is an admission and they've been awfully strident about groomers lately.
No need. There is a 100% chance that everyone that would vote for a measure like this has loads of porn on their devices already.
Most porn viewers are in red states but we all know they are above the law, so it's good
I’m not looking forward to learning what weird shit this dude is actually into. It’s gotta be real pervert hours when he goes down to his sex dungeon.
He prob got caught watching porn by his wife and he had to go all scorched earth to get her to not take the kids and leave
Yeah but a sex dungeon is not porn /s
100% this guy films women attaching his balls to jumper cables and shitting on his chest.
- %.
Because America doesn't suffer enough from frivolous prosecutions and overcrowded prisons.
That's the point. The US has for profit prisons and also uses prisoners as slave labor (ok, technically not slave, they officially get paid, but it's like $0.03 an hour or something, so it's effectively slave labor). More prisoners means more profits for the owners and the politicians they give kickbacks to. They're modern day plantations. The more things change the more they stay the same.
They're usually paid some miniscule amount, but not always; the 13th amendment specifically allows prisoners to be used as slaves. Most states have laws banning it, but not all of them.
Yeah, I tend to use the phrase "coerced labor" when I talk about that s***.
I completely agree with everything you're saying, the American criminal, judicial and prison system is absolutely f****** horrifying.
He’s like the preacher in ”There Will Be Blood”
Jesus save us from your followers.
American Taliban
Are any of his views backed up by Jesus?
Jesus lived in a region conquered by the Roman Empire. Many of his fans at the time wanted him to be a conquering ruler and overthrow them. His answer in the text amounted to, "that's not why I'm here." Nominal Christians trying to install a Christian Government have missed the point of their own text so hard it's actually kinda funny.
Jesus: Share resources among those that need them, it's very hard for rich people to enter heaven.
His Followers: Temporarily embarrassed billionaires who idolize wealth and build literal golden statues of their favorite rich guy.
Jesus: Hangs out with tax collectors (i.e., agents of the Romans, who were not popular), hookers, low status foreigners, and people with terminal diseases.
His Followers: Ew, drag queens and brown people. Gross.
Jesus: Encourages non-violent responses to his own capture pending execution. Tells many parables about forgiveness and treating foreigners as neighbors.
His Followers: Immigrants are invading us! They terk our jerbs! BOMB IRAN!
Anyone seeing a pattern here? The reality is that Christianity isn't really a belief system for them, it's a cultural identity or tribal marker. You don't have to actually believe any of this shit or behave accordingly. All you have to do is say the right words and present the right image. Right wing Evangelical Christianity is a hollowed out husk; an empty aesthetic presenting as a belief system that promises that anything you do will be wiped away if you say the right words and give money to whatever charlatan is giving his Dollar General Ted Talk today.
And is prolly a secret pedo
In this case, the law could potentially give green light to CP as long as it's between married couples, as
- it has an exception for married couples,
- it does not differentiate between porn of consenting adults and of children who cannot consent.
After seeing many laws that are written in a way they have other effects that are "totally unintended", I refuse to believe this guy isn't aware the pedo part of his law. I usually oppose pedojacketing, but in this case it's not unwarranted.
Probably? This is textbook for these people. Every accusation from Conservatives is an admission of guilt.
Y'all Qaida
Vanilla ISIS
Other way around. Christian extremism predates Islam as a religion.
Its also almost certainly directly responsible for the burning of the Library of Alexandria, and possibly the burning of Rome.
It's also why European folklore and ancient customs don't really exist other than bits and pieces outside of a few places. Christian extremism wiped it out.
This is the best summary I could come up with:
In Deevers’ view, civil society, apart from the influence of overt Christian doctrine, is not a neutral middle ground, but rather the realm of the devil, or what he calls “a serpentine theocracy.”
But when Deevers opens his mouth, he invariably presents a jarring, black-and-white view of the role of government — which he believes exists to “protect innocent people and to punish and terrorize evildoers.”
While campaigning, Deevers told a religious podcast he also favors “public shaming for those who are at fault in divorce.” (In a related essay, he calls this “an important act of justice for both the transgressor and the transgressed.”)
Deevers embodies a threat that experts believe Christian nationalism poses to democracy — by literally demonizing his opponents, and casting compromise as moral corruption.
As Brad Onishi, author of an “Extremist History of Christian Nationalism,” recently described in an interview with Rolling Stone: “If you’re a person who is convinced that the United States is under threat by a Luciferian regime, comprised of Marxist globalist secularists, feminists, the LGBTQ community, and so on, democracy is not your sacred value.”
Pitching himself to voters, Deevers filmed a campaign ad wielding a rifle while wearing a black T-shirt that read: “Obey God: Defy Tyrants.” He railed against “the Godless leftist agenda” that he warned threatens “thriving families and their moral development.” He additionally decried “drag queen story hour” and the “chemical and surgical mutilation of our kids.” A longtime opponent of abortion, Deevers positioned this stance in biblical terms as “loving my pre-born neighbor as myself.”
The original article contains 1,420 words, the summary contains 259 words. Saved 82%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!