this post was submitted on 25 Apr 2024
104 points (98.1% liked)

Linux

54354 readers
238 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Please don't get me wrong, this is not meant to be rude slander. MX Linux is not a bad Distro at all (even tho I've always opted for Debian instead) and peops are free to use what suits them best.

But compared to other Distros (like Arch, Fedora, Ubuntu, Debian or Mint) there doesn't seem to be much excitement about it. I hardly see articles about MX and I have barely seen people outing themselves as MX users which makes me wonder:

Are MX users just low key quiet, am I escaping their presence or is there a different reason for MX' high HPD score?

Btw: feel free to take a shot every time I write MX :p

(page 2) 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] DmMacniel@feddit.de 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I never encountered MX. What is it's usecase?

[–] Shareni@programming.dev 3 points 1 year ago

What is it’s usecase?

Improved Debian for desktop

[–] zyratoxx@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

It's a lightweight distro mainly for old or cheap hardware. It comes with a lot of tools pre-installed and is very conservative towards updates.

[–] boredsquirrel@slrpnk.net 6 points 1 year ago (5 children)

No shit how? I actually used it because of damn distrowatch, it is solid but damn Debian based. Had to switch because the Nextcloud version was outdated and didnt work with an updated server.

[–] zyratoxx@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I mean, if it is just the client app you could see if the Flatpak version works better. ^^

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Shareni@programming.dev 23 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Are MX users just low key quiet, am I escaping their presence or is there a different reason for MX' high HPD score?

That's definitely a factor. People write and talk about new and exciting stuff, MX is neither. There's no point in writing an article that goes: MX experience - same as a year ago because nothing changed, see ya again in a year.

[–] zyratoxx@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Still more informative than every "Chrome Unboxed" article ever lol

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] green_witch@beehaw.org 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)

MX Linux is my daily atm. I tend to hop around every few months (normally I use Mint.). Honestly, I'm enjoying it far more than Mint and don't see that changing.

Dunno about what's up with distrowatch; just chiming in as that one MX Linux person.

[–] sexy_peach@beehaw.org 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

What do you like about it?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] zyratoxx@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

Nice to finally meet you folks :3

[–] d3Xt3r@lemmy.nz 132 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

Because:

The DistroWatch Page Hit Ranking statistics are a light-hearted way of measuring the popularity of Linux distributions and other free operating systems among the visitors of this website. They correlate neither to usage nor to quality and should not be used to measure the market share of distributions. They simply show the number of times a distribution page on DistroWatch was accessed each day, nothing more.

So people see it on the list and click on it wondering "what the heck is this MX Linux thing". And that boosts the ranking. And now that it's at the top, it attracts more curious clicks, thus it continues to remain on top.

[–] chepycou@rcsocial.net 6 points 1 year ago (4 children)

@d3Xt3r @zyratoxx IT is true that this is a terrible way of measuring popularity, like they could put surveys or use the searches on the site for instance

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] HarriPotero@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I haven't tried MX Linux. So they set the distrowatch page as start page in the browser, and users never change it?

[–] Fisch@discuss.tchncs.de 17 points 1 year ago

No, people go on the distrowatch website, see mx linux at the top and wonder what it is because it seems to be popular but they've never heard of it, so they click on it, which boosts the ranking and makes it remain at the top. A website can't change your browser's start page.

[–] Shareni@programming.dev 32 points 1 year ago (3 children)

And now that it's at the top, it attracts more curious clicks, thus it continues to remain on top.

That's exactly how I learned about MX and started using it.

[–] boredsquirrel@slrpnk.net 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

"You know what MX stands for?"

"Maestro Xylophone?"

"Mix King"

gif

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] zyratoxx@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Definitely, but still those hit per day numbers gotta come from somewhere. There is of course the possibility to mess around here but I don't want to make accusations out of the blue when there may be that huge fanbase that's just keeping it low >.<

[–] Deebster@programming.dev 23 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Distro watch rankings are just which page gets the most hits. Get a bunch of different IPs to load LemmyLinux and it'll be number one (and then actual people will click on it to see what it is and why it's number one).

[–] zyratoxx@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I too had the thought that some people might mess around with the hpd numbers but I don't want to make accusations without solid proof ^^

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments