this post was submitted on 19 Apr 2024
1303 points (99.8% liked)

World News

39032 readers
2431 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 31 points 7 months ago (4 children)

At this point I just stopped buying chips. Feels like such a waste to fill the bag less than half way...

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago

Care for a modest proposal?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 months ago (16 children)

I don't think this is the right way to go. Mandatory "compare prices" to be displayed with the same, or better, viability as the price is much better. That way the consumer immediately sees that the price went up since last week. What it also brings is the opportunity to compare which one of two sizes of the same product is a better deal.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

It really needs to be weight/price or size/price then. The way this sounds in the article the producers just also need to change price a little to avoid getting that sign. Per weight or size that might still end up more expensive for the consumer.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago (2 children)

In the US grocery stores are required to list the cost per weight. It mostly works, unless one of the manufacturers decides to show the price in grams or kilograms, as opposed to oz or pounds.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)
[–] [email protected] 86 points 7 months ago (10 children)

Really we just need to standardize sizes for consumer goods. For example: drinks can come in 250, 500, 750, 1000, and 2000 mL sizes. Sold soap must be sold in units of 100, 500, or 1000 grams. And so on...

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] [email protected] 64 points 7 months ago (2 children)

We used to have standardized package sizes in the EU for things like butter, chocolate, etc. So stupid to give that up

[–] [email protected] 24 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I guarantee it's because of neoliberals and conservatives trying to emulate The US.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 7 months ago

It was in the name of customer convenience and individualism of course. Think of the singles!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 26 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

Greed is now baked into capitalism. Morals and ethics be damned, squeeze and squeeze and see what the market and consumer will bear. So what if much of the population is struggling economically, and more have been thrown into outright poverty. And that record number of people are homeless and sleeping rough.

Consolidation and deregulation always benefits the few over the many, all the while claiming it will be beneficial to consumers. I'm always amused by the religious folks who defend free market greed as though God is a cruel, exploitive being who's big on dog-eat-dog capitalism.

Margin expansion under the guise/cover of inflation should be criminal.

What I would love to see one day is the margin pocketed for every product sold on display next to the price tag.

Retailers could have chosen to eat these higher costs and weather lower profit margins, but instead, the FTC found that on aggregate retailers passed all higher costs onto consumers and raised prices even more to increase their profit margins, too. This finding isn’t totally new, several economists and researchers (including me) pointed out this trend at the time. https://www.foodandpower.net/latest/ftc-supply-chain-disruption-grocery-food-processing-report-apr-24

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 7 months ago (1 children)

So, they cut the price and cut the size followed by a price raise 6 months later?

[–] [email protected] 16 points 7 months ago (2 children)

They cut the size, but not the price. Then they increase the price six months later.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 7 months ago

Even the title says "signs in front of all products that have been reduced in size without a corresponding price cut"

[–] [email protected] 8 points 7 months ago

or cut the size but keep the price the same, then release a new "jumbo size" that's as big as the previous size (with the new and improved higher unit price), then discontinue the "standard" size.

[–] [email protected] 49 points 7 months ago

good ol' name and shame!

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

SAME GREAT TASTE!!!

[–] [email protected] 132 points 7 months ago (4 children)

This has been the law in Brazil for more than 10 years now. We have lots of problems here, but at least our consumer protection laws are top notch. And, believe or not, they're enforced successfully.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 7 months ago

Thanks for sharing, it's great tk hear and I didn't know!

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 33 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I think the unit price should be more prominent than the price per item.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 7 months ago (1 children)

And the units should be consistent. It drives me nuts when I'm in a store and the unit varies across different sizes of the same product.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (3 children)

Who the fuck even knows what the unit price of paper towels is?!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

And each brand has a different tear-off square size. Some have 'jumbo size' and also 'pick-a-size' where its smaller rectangles tear offs instead of squares.

How do you compare? You dont and its by design

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago

Turns per roll on one brand, grams per inch for the next, and ounces per half-roll for your third choice.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 7 months ago
[–] [email protected] 20 points 7 months ago

I was thinking about this the other day when I noticed my deodorant was 2.7fl oz instead of the usual 3. The stores are complicit. They know every time something shrinks because they have to print new tags. Even if it's the old price, the unit price has changed, and I believe the barcode is different.

No warnings. No heads up. Just silent acceptance. Sure, if they posted a warning I wouldn't buy that product but dammit I need deodorant!

[–] [email protected] 14 points 7 months ago (1 children)

US market: Just puts one big sign outside that has an "everything" warning.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›