Do they even try to connect the dots and point to the need to develop PV energy in that article?
It seems to me they are carefully avoiding the probable solution.
Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.
As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades:
How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world:
Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:
Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.
Do they even try to connect the dots and point to the need to develop PV energy in that article?
It seems to me they are carefully avoiding the probable solution.
Or we could just…abandon this concept of machine learning until we have the bigger issues handled. Like, the planet trying to shake us off like fleas, for instance.
Hope this idiotic dotcom bouble 2.0 dies fast. Its just hurting the world all together.