A community for discussing events around the World
Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
News [email protected]
Politics [email protected]
World Politics [email protected]
For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/
@Biden
Seriously the US is enough land. And Australia. And South Africa. And Israel. How big does the World Reich have to be before you are satisfied?
Go home. Not all Arabs need to die.
Edit: Oh yeah, there are several Germanic countries in Europe. Probably should add those as well.
Do they have permission from the Iraqi government, which is after all supposed to be a friendly government? Or is this another case of sovereignty not mattering when it's inconvenient for the US? (Won't even bother asking about Syria.)
No Iraq officials condemned the attacks and accused the US of violating the countries sovereignty.
"These strikes constitute a violation of Iraqi sovereignty, an undermining of the efforts of the Iraqi government, and a threat that will drag Iraq and the region into undesirable consequences, the consequences of which will be dire for security and stability in Iraq and the region,” Yahya Rasool Iraqi commander in chief
Bomb Iranian oil fields.
Make gas cost $10 per gallon. Incentivize public transportation and fuel efficient vehicles, simultaneously crippling Iran.
What? The US gets its oil from...the US.
Not really, yes the US is a net exporter of oil; however, the refineries in the US can’t process the type of oil the US produces. So, America exports sour crude and imports sweet crude.
It’s a global market. The US exports oil. The price would go up.
Just what we need; a third, simultaneous, open war.
we're just getting started
This isn't an open war.
It's a limited amount of retaliatory and proportional strikes, meant to dissuade further attacks on US forces and international shipping. They've also chosen not to attack Iran, exactly because they want to avoid escalation.
If the US hadn't responded, it would only have made things worse. You can't just ignore groups murdering your soldiers. That'll only invite more of this crap. Terrorists shooting at container ships is also not good for anyone.
The same thing happened with Iran and Pakistan recently. Iran struck Pakistan. Pakistan struck back. They both came to the conclusion they didn't want an open war, and made a statement to that effect.
Except Iran has already pledged a 'strong response', should these strikes occur:
https://globalnews.ca/news/10262185/iran-response-jordan-attack-us-soldiers/
They'll respond, then the US will respond again, and on and on.
When does it end? An eye for an eye for and eye for an eye...... Do we just accept going blind?
/edit; somewhere in there I miss read Iraq as Iran... Thought they had struck Iran. Perhaps this won't be as much of an issue. Time will tell I guess.
When does it end? An eye for an eye for and eye for an eye...... Do we just accept going blind?
This quote always bothered me...There'll be one guy left with one eye. How's the last blind guy gonna take out the eye of the last guy left? Gandhi was wrong.
In the land of the blind, the one eyed man is king!
true. you only have to be the first who pokes an eye.
The finding out phase has begun.
Why were they in Jordan in the first place? Also, how much you wanna bet the people being bombed had nothing to do with it, but the US had to show they're doing something.
You finding out why you don't have healthcare?
I mean, think about the sorry state of their democracy... in Russia you go to vote knpwing only one party can win, in the US you know only one of two quasi identical parties.
Only one of those parties wants me dead, but I guess if you view it from the perspective that minorities just don't matter at all, I can see how you'd get confused.
I'd say that the fact that both parties want someone dead is the real problem - but what do I know about democracy, I'm just a poor european after all..
Most Europeans are also not particularly approving of trans folks tbqh. There's a reason we emigrate to blue states across the ocean.
I dont see how it is related but good luck.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_dilemma
Per capita the US spends up to four times as much as comparable developed countries on healthcare, countries which often have something approaching universal healthcare which is affordable for almost everyone.
In other words, the US could spends less on healthcare, more on defense, and still have universal and better healthcare.
I would I could.. dream a little dream..
Our lack of healthcare has nothing to do with lack of spending. We spend more on public healthcare per capita than countries with universal public healthcare.
Our problem is lack of price control, not lack of funds.
le me and my tired brain processing words very slowly
US begins strikes... good, good, they need those, their workers are treated like shit ... on militias in Iraq and Syria... oh, less good, these are not worker strikes.