TechTakes

1799 readers

14 users here now

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Zuckerberg ordered Snapchat to literally man-in-the-middle attack customers (arstechnica.com)

submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

4 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I'm not sure if this fully fits into TechTakes mission statement, but "CEO thinks it's a-okay to abuse certificate trust to sell data to advertisers" is, in my opinion, a great snapshot of what brain worms live inside those people's heads.

In short, Facebook wiretapped Snapchat by sending data through their VPN company, Onavo. Installing it on your machine would add their certificates as trusted. Onavo would then intercept all communication to Snapchat and pretend the connection is TLS-secure by forging a Snapchat certificate and signing it with its own.

"Whenever someone asks a question about Snapchat, the answer is usually that because their traffic is encrypted, we have no analytics about them," Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg wrote in a 2016 email to Javier Olivan.

"Given how quickly they're growing, it seems important to figure out a new way to get reliable analytics about them," Zuckerberg continued. "Perhaps we need to do panels or write custom software. You should figure out how to do this."

Zuckerberg ordered his engineers to "think outside the box" to break TLS encryption in a way that would allow them to quietly sell data to advertisers.

I'm sure the brave programmers that came up with and implemented this nonsense were very proud of their service. Jesus fucking cinammon crunch Christ.

top 4 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So are we on the precipice of the worlds largest lawsuit from Snap or do they have an interest in letting this slide?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

The Onavo app used by FB to MitM traffic is just a VPN, as long as FB can reasonably argue it was installed by users willingly they should be in the clear.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

I'm interested to see what, if anything, comes from this case.

Seems like pretty cut and dry; large scale criminal wire tapping by a private corporation...

I'm glad I abandoned Facebook/Meta and all its affiliates long ago. Just not long ago enough... :/

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

forging a Snapchat certificate and signing it with its own.

Sounds to me like that should be a violation of Title 18 U.S. Code § 1030, the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act. A violation for every individual message that was intercepted.

All C-level employees or board members that knew of the program and did not blow a whistle should be tried, in addition to the company itself being fined.

Yes this would likely kill Facebook on fines alone. The fact nothing even remotely close to this will never happen shows how much power we've willingly given up as citizens by electing politicians for businesses and refusing to remove money from politics.