this post was submitted on 02 Feb 2024
675 points (99.1% liked)

Technology

59161 readers
1940 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

One of Google Search's oldest and best-known features, cache links, are being retired. Best known by the "Cached" button, those are a snapshot of a web page the last time Google indexed it. However, according to Google, they're no longer required.

"It was meant for helping people access pages when way back, you often couldn’t depend on a page loading,” Google's Danny Sullivan wrote. “These days, things have greatly improved. So, it was decided to retire it."

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 47 points 9 months ago (14 children)

How has no one worked on a new search engine over the last decade or so where Google has been on a clear decline in its flagship product!

I know of the likes of DDG, and Bing has worked hard to catch up, but I'm genuinely surprised that a startup hasn't risen to find a novel way of attacking reliable web search. Some will say it's a "solved problem", but I'd argue that it was, but no longer.

A web search engine that crawls and searches historic versions of a web page could be an incredibly useful resource. If someone can also find a novel way to rank and crawl web applications or to find ways to "open" the closed web, it could pair with web search to be a genuine Google killer.

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 9 months ago

Such bullshit.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 9 months ago

Fuck. I sometimes use the text-only version to access sites with too many moving elements or when the site is geoblocked or doesn't respect cookies choices and denies access. So far, it has been the most reliable one for me.

[–] [email protected] 49 points 9 months ago

Time to donate to the internet archibe.

[–] [email protected] 49 points 9 months ago (1 children)

It was meant for helping people access pages when way back, you often couldn’t depend on a page loading,” Google's Danny Sullivan wrote. “These days, things have greatly improved. So, it was decided to retire it."

They still go down, Danny. And fairly frequently at that. Y'all are fuckin' stupid.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 9 months ago

I'd say things are much worse than they used to be. Sure, in the past sites would disappear or completely fail more often. But, because most sites were static, those were the only ways they could fail. These days the cache feature is useful for websites that have javascript bugs preventing them from displaying properly, or where the content-management-system still pretends the link works but where it silently just loads different content.

[–] [email protected] 112 points 9 months ago (6 children)

Without getting into too much detail, a cached site saved my ass in a court case. Fuck you Google.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Was that not something the Wayback Machine could have solved?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago

Need the tea!!!

[–] [email protected] 14 points 9 months ago (1 children)

It sucks because it's sometimes (but not very often) useful but it's not like they are under any obligation to support it or are getting any money from doing it.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 9 months ago (3 children)

Isn't caching how anti-paywall sites like 12ft.io work?

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 22 points 9 months ago

That is BS, a site can be down at any time, did we fix downtimes for good? Those down detector sites might just shut down as well then ಠ_ಠ

[–] [email protected] 29 points 9 months ago

Ironically, the link to this as article is offline for me. "Cached" surely would solve my problem.

[–] [email protected] 117 points 9 months ago (1 children)

of course it is. why have anything good on there, no point reminding me of the old days when the internet was actually fucking useful

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›