this post was submitted on 10 Apr 2024
10 points (100.0% liked)

United States | News & Politics

7211 readers
371 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A Boeing quality engineer went public Tuesday with damaging allegations that the jet-maker took manufacturing shortcuts to increase production rates that leave potentially serious structural flaws on its 787 and 777 widebody planes.

The Boeing engineer, Sam Salehpour, alleged that almost 1,000 787s and about 400 777s currently flying are at risk of premature fatigue damage and structural failure.

all 38 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

You know they could just bring back the 747 and make a bunch of those but new. And have less problems?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

they’d still find ways to reduce production costs and increase risk to passengers

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

Yeah the problem is not the design, it's the manufacturing.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago

If it's Boeing, I ain't going.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

Fingers crossed they don't decide to shoot themselves in the back of the head 🤞

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago

I really hope he has a plan to stay safe and also has a document saved with multiple people in the event of an 'unforseen sudden death'.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

He will probably soon die from a car crash or suicide by 54 shots in the back of the head

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

'member when 747 was shorthand for any commercial passenger jet?

the enshitification will continue until profits improve

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

God dammit dude why did this have to be the year that I'm doing a lot of flying

[–] [email protected] -2 points 7 months ago (3 children)

Stop flying a lot. Jesus, you do realize the harm you're causing the climate?!?

We need a frequent flyler tax ffs

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I said "this year", and I'm flying 4 times. Lots of people who need to travel for work do more than that in a month. Relax.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Wow, are you really so ignorant? You fly like 10-100x more frequently than the average person. Don't you realize what the NO2 does to the atmosphere at those altitudes?

Your carbon footprint is probably in the top 10% of all humans. It everyone lived like you, we'd need 20 earths. We only have 1 earth, and you're killing it.

Our grandchildren will wonder why we didn't send people like you to the guillotine for all the people you're killing.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Holy shit the melodrama. Focus this energy on somebody who actually doesn't give a shit about the environment. Maybe not, y'know, someone who just has to get to a couple fucking weddings and flies coach. Would you like me to refuse to go to the weddings on the grounds of the climate? I'm terribly sorry that my entire family and everyone I know doesn't live within walkable distance, that's really my mistake. If you think I'm a murderer, then how about you act like it and come get me. Act on the terrible crime you apparently think I'm committing instead of this virtue signaling garbage. Moron.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

This person doesn't give a shit. That's the point.

And obviously you don't either. Look in a mirror. Stop the mass extinction that you're causing if you fly more than once per year.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

This is you, by the way. Really helping the cause by being a toxic ass on the internet. What a visionary. I'm not taking responsibility for the structure of society that got rolling years and years before I was born. I'm also not going to cut ties with family and friends and ruin my own life for the sake of preventing the very, very little that I'm actually contributing to greenhouse gasses. Fucking cope, and find a new angle. You've got the wrong guy. You're lucky I'm not the type to associate your behavior with all environmentalists. People seem to be agreeing with me that this misdirected virtuous hero act isn't working for you.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Way to dodge everything I said, hyperbolic virtue signaler. I hope you've never been a passenger in a car or a plane, else you're a massive hypocrite too.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago (3 children)

Busses. Bikes. Trains. Boats.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

By the way, busses create greenhouse gasses. If we need to get carbon emissions to zero, and you take the bus, by your own logic, you are a murderer. Stew on that for a bit.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Plenty of busses run on city electric grids. But you're right, we need to make all busses electric and make the electricity renewable. Its not OK to burn a gram of fossil fuels.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Well gee wiz, I sure hope you're ensuring any and all of your electricity is coming from renewable sources without emissions. That coal stuff is pretty nasty! Otherwise you'd be a bit of a hypocrite every time you posted something here, wouldn't you?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Bike trip would take weeks, bus trip several days, have you heard of the train system in the US? And if it's across land, well, guess I can't take a boat! Guess what that leaves?

What would you suggest in this case, o' paragon of virtue?

Do you have a job? Is it feasible for you to ride your bike for weeks to get to commitments? Or are you, as the other commenter said, speaking from a very, very privileged position?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I've traveled across the US by bus, train, and bicucle. Im quite familiar with those methods of transport, yes. I recommend trains.

If you can't make it to your comittments with reasonable methods of public transportation you have too many comittments.

Adjust your life to what is sustainable. Don't try to fit a square peg in a circular hole. If you are invited to some event that's thousands of miles away, say you can't go because its too far.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Traveled across the US by bus?! Sorry, I'm not interested in the opinions of mass murderers. I weep for your victims. Somebody bring out the guillotine.

And that's a "no" on the full-time job, then?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

You're preaching from a position of luxury though. Not everyone has jobs in their immediate area. Not everyone has family in their immediate area. Not everyone can drive hundreds of miles with an electric car to make ends meet. Not everyone has access to affordable rail.

I'm happy you have these things, and commend you for your relatively small impact on the Earth, but just know that a lot of people don't have that choice.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

The majority of the population has a phone, and cities need more mixed use affordable blousing

99% of people have access to busses, but they refuse to use them like selfish assholes.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

You need carve a path of compromise to reach your ideals. Also, many women do not feel safe on buses in the US.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I, for one, recommend the frequent flyler tax. Absolutlely.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Flying should also be taxed heavier when an alternative is feasible like a train.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago

So, not in the US then.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

ruckblack isn't the problem unless he flies a private jet.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Both of those groups are the problem.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Those are just the first two, I posted an article a week or two that had shown that 80% of climate issues are corporations, big and small, and private jets. There was a boom of private jets around the pandemic. Maybe so they could still travel and hide it? I'm not positive, I don't know when the dates of private jet use boomed.

https://theweek.com/news/environment/960974/how-much-pollution-do-private-planes-cause

https://www.greenmatters.com/p/environmental-impact-private-jet

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

We have to cut carbon emissions 100%

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

No shit, Sherlock. What are you actively doing to accomplish that?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Dudes got some balls after what happened to the last guy

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago

Suicide by employer