this post was submitted on 05 Apr 2024
1488 points (99.3% liked)

Science Memes

10940 readers
1890 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.

Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.

Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
1488
How to open a textbook (lemmy.world)
submitted 7 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
67 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 10 points 7 months ago

This is beautiful and I must study this subject now.

You know; so I have an excuse.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 7 months ago (2 children)

you could always just stop studying that field.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 7 months ago

So you are just going to live forever?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 months ago

Of course, but then the book isn't for you.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago

Thanks Thiccle Rick

[–] [email protected] 22 points 7 months ago (2 children)

My favorite class in grad school. I absolutely loved deriving the laws of thermodynamics from first principles based the random motion of atoms. It was beautiful.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 months ago

Is the grad school in the room now? Do you need help?

[–] [email protected] -5 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Grad school? This is for 4y bachelor student

[–] [email protected] 8 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Bachelor student? I learned this in high school

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

No flexing, was just wondering why

[–] [email protected] 8 points 7 months ago (1 children)

If you didn't study this in elementary school, I don't know what kind of bullshit school you went to.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Umm, this is the first thing we were taught on the first day of kindergarten.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago

Goo gah

[–] [email protected] 20 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I don't know. I like Griffith's Quantum Mechanics which opens saying if you think you're starting to understand this stuff, you really haven't.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Electrons, why do you behave differently when I'm looking at you?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 months ago

Because you're touching them with your eyes

[–] [email protected] 50 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

We are all gas with a slightly denser particle distribution.

🔫

[–] [email protected] 23 points 7 months ago

We all are vast collections of harmonic oscillators.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 7 months ago (1 children)

id want to kill myself too. just from the very little i know from computer stuff, imagine doing an entire semester

[–] [email protected] 14 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Physics ≠ Computer Science

[–] [email protected] 27 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Can't have computer science without physics.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago

Sure you can. Physics is describing what is, computer science is building what could be

The two things require very little overlap. Even physics systems in video games don't use real physics - it just feels better when you fudge it

[–] [email protected] 7 points 7 months ago (2 children)

I'm not entirely sure of that. You can't have comp sci without algebra and potentially calculus. I could see a society that developed all three fields before they codified Physics

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Do you really think people could make programmable microchips and processing units before they figured out physics?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (3 children)

No, but mechanical computers existed before microchips. They just weren't terribly useful

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Wouldn't you also need to know physics in order to make a mechanical computer?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Not necessarily. We had the theory of mechanical computers well before both calculus and physics.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

What kind of argumentation is this? Are we talking about mechanical engineering or computer science? Please don't bent reality the way it fits your shape.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] -2 points 7 months ago (2 children)

I know what mechanical computers are. But computer scientists will not be building them 'nor program them, it's not what computer science is about when you go to a university to study it.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago

computer science teaches you the theories of computation which absolute starts with mechanical computers.

if one didn’t study Turing’s tape machine in their compsci program then they should demand their money back.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago

I presented a hypothetical, and showed how it could work. You're the one insisting that there's only one way to do things. You're being Western Centric.

I'm well aware of what you study when you study computer science, I majored in that and Music Ed at Transylvania University.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 months ago

Once I get my mechanical computer to run crysis we'll see who's laughing.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago (2 children)

How do you have computer science without calculus? Calculus is literally necessary for computer science, otherwise it'd just be like... shitty statistics with a little programming

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

It would be inelegant as all fuck, but you could get away with just algebra, there are comp sci courses that only need algebra as the foundation.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago

as far as i can tell, the ones that do that are usually just programming courses with "computer science" slapped onto the title. but i havent exactly gone to many colleges so i don't have the experience to say so.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Care to expand? Things like complexity theory and type theory, for example, have nothing to do with calculus

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

In general, a lot of the stuff computer science shares with data science uses calculus, a lot of the statistics too, but also visuals and modelling other sciences (e.g. simulations) use calculus heavily. I recall utilising vector calc a decent amount when working with Vulkan, for example

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

Sounds like programming more than CS, in that case, fair enough. Also the linear algebra in computer graphics is, well, algebra, not calculus.

[–] [email protected] 113 points 7 months ago

One opening line that's always stuck with me is:

"The doctor said I was a paranoid schizophrenic. Well, he didn't actually say it, but we knew he was thinking it."

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago

does statistical mechanics help explain how often this gets posted here? 🙃

load more comments
view more: next ›