this post was submitted on 18 Jun 2025
1 points (100.0% liked)

Fuck Cars

12325 readers
152 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago

Thanks Obama

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (4 children)

But I need my insanely large blacked out, lifted, with black rims, f-250. I have to get 3 bags of groceries.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (3 children)

The shift to these ridiculously large trucks is partially consequent of the poorly-implemented Obama fuel economy regulations. The regulations were determined by wheelbase and tread width, which disincentivized manufacturers from making mid- or small-sized trucks. The bigger they made them, the less restricted they were by fuel economy. Larger vehicles also ease constraints on engineers; they don't have to struggle fitting a lot into a small body. Once large trucks became the default offering, they morphed into the annoying cultural "status" symbol we know today.

Anyway I have a Miata MX-5 and I love my tiny car.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (2 children)

The CAFE act caused most of these changes and was signed by Clinton in the early '90s. Obama may have made things worse, but the roots of the problem go back much further

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago

I also love your tiny car, even when I see one from behind the wheel of my slightly less tiny Civic, which I adore.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (5 children)

I was in Rome last week and pleasantly surprised to see how many tiny cars they use.

There were plenty of Smart cars, but also many other ultra minis like Citroën AMI, XEV Yo-Yo and Renault Twizy.

They're not just concept cars or used as gimmicks like elsewhere. People actually use them for their daily business.

The traffic in Rome is insane though. The reason they use tiny cars isn't that the roads are small, but due to congestion and parking. It makes very little sense to own a car there at all.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago

It makes sense for Rome though, these cars are expensive and appeal to the fashion sensibilities of the population there, rather than just using the good public transport there. It's a signal of wealth, rather than an actual functional commodity.

I found this out the hard way the last time I expressed my love of the AMI

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago

i live in malta and got an xev yoyo amonths ago today. It's my daily driver.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I mean why would that not be so? I no longer own a car but when I did, it was usually oversized for what I needed to transport (me and my backpack).

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago

I have a small 3-door Corsa and it is oversized for my cargo :D (me and you guessed it, my backpack lol)

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›