this post was submitted on 03 Jan 2024
2 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

59161 readers
2140 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
2
Maestro, a Linux compatible kernel written in Rust. (blog.lenot.re)
submitted 10 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
10 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Enter Maestro, a unix-like monolithic kernel that aims to be compatible with Linux in order to ensure wide compatibility. Interestingly, it is written in Rust. It includes Solfége, a boot system and daemon manager, maestro-utils, which is a collection of system utility commands, and blimp, a package manager. According to Luc, it’s creator, the following third-party software has been tested and is working on the OS: musl (C standard library), bash, Some GNU coreutils commands such as ls, cat, mkdir, rm, rmdir, uname, whoami, etc… neofetch (a patched version, since the original neofetch does not know about the OS). If you want to test it out, fire up a VM with at least 1 GB of ram.

top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (2 children)

According to Luc, its* creator

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Username checks out

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

N O T I T S

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

Username checks out?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Keep fighting the good fight. Syntax is important.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

Yes. Thank you, "It's no tits"!

[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Ok, I'm out of the loop and I've seen this often enough that I have to ask; why do people always bring up "written in rust"? No one points out that a given project is written in C++/C#/python/ruby etc, yet we keep seeing it for rust.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

If you want a real answer, it's mostly advocacy, the same reason Linux enthusiasts show up to every negative-sounding Windows thread to tell you to install Linux instead. And if it is less obnoxious, it's only because there's fewer Rust enthusiasts.

There are, also, advantages to a Rust implementation that you can claim simply by virtue of something being implemented in Rust, as entire categories of problem that cause C projects to hemorrhage security vulnerabilities simply don't exist for Rust.

But mostly it's people wanting you to be excited about and interested in Rust.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Is there something inherently safer with how rust does things, or is it just a case of it being new, so the vulnerabilities haven't been found yet?

[–] [email protected] -1 points 10 months ago

I only know the hype. But the hype says that Rust's ownership system makes memory usage much safer by forcing the coder to deal with data. Your values will eventually go out of scope, and you have to dictate when that will happen or else it won't compile.

...or something like that.