this post was submitted on 31 Mar 2024
-34 points (18.5% liked)

Canada

7203 readers
135 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


🍁 Meta


πŸ—ΊοΈ Provinces / Territories


πŸ™οΈ Cities / Local Communities


πŸ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


πŸ’» Universities


πŸ’΅ Finance / Shopping


πŸ—£οΈ Politics


🍁 Social and Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca/


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 9 points 7 months ago

That's it? That's like at most $50 per person. And remember, money that is sent to the poor will be reinvested into the larger economy through increased consumption, or more sales for the employers.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago

What a dumb headline

[–] [email protected] 15 points 7 months ago

Somehow, giving money to poor people, which they'll spend on goods and services to stimulate the economy is bad...

...but giving money to rich people that they'll sock away in their bank account or invest into non-productive assets is good?

[–] [email protected] 12 points 7 months ago

I used to work for a small company and the boss was a member of the CFIB. We'd get their emails all the time and they were some of the worst takes I've ever seen.

One I always remembered had a subject like "How to tackle the youth employment problem" and the body of the email gave tips on how to avoid paying young people anything more than the absolute minimum, because young people don't deserve pay. It talked about how the young generation was entitled and demanding things that need to be earned through years of hard work and loyalty, and not to give in to those demands.

So yeah, terrible source OP.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago

The West links it to inflation.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 7 months ago

And that's a good thing!

[–] [email protected] 9 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

That's it? That means the hike only accounts for a $54 million worth raise to all workers across Atlantic Canada, that's peanuts. Triple that hike, it would still be a blip and workers would still be underpaid.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

If you poor people could just do more and survive on less but still somehow spend just as much, then the employers would be fine. /s

[–] [email protected] 11 points 7 months ago

Connect minimum wage increases to the actual increases in the median wage in the province. As wages increase, then the minimum wage can increase by the same amount.

I say we link it to the maximum wage instead, since that's a better indicator of how much resources we have to go around.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Will add $54.5 million to the economy

FTFY.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 7 months ago

And, statistically speaking, minimum wage employees will spend a much higher proportion of their income than millionaire assholes.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 7 months ago (1 children)

That it costs money to hike the minimum wage is news now?

[–] [email protected] 22 points 7 months ago (1 children)

It's not a news outlet. It's a pro-employer propaganda site

[–] [email protected] 7 points 7 months ago

Ah, now I get why it's being downvoted. What a lousy spin to put on something so necessary as minimum wage increases.